2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-020-1719-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional Sobolev metrics on spaces of immersions

Abstract: We prove that the geodesic equations of all Sobolev metrics of fractional order one and higher on spaces of diffeomorphisms and, more generally, immersions are locally well posed. This result builds on the recently established real analytic dependence of fractional Laplacians on the underlying Riemannian metric. It extends several previous results and applies to a wide range of variational partial differential equations, including the well-known Euler-Arnold equations on diffeomorphism groups as well as the ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From here the result follows using the definition of the inertia operator A c , the product rule for the term ∇ ∂s (Ψ c (c t , c t )v), by using the formula Proof of Theorem 3.8. For closed curves, i.e., D = S 1 , this result can be found in [10,Theorem 4.4], see also [28,6]. In the following we will focus on the case of open curves, where the proof will be slightly more involved due to the existence of a boundary.…”
Section: Incompleteness Of Constant Coefficient Metrics On Open Curvesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From here the result follows using the definition of the inertia operator A c , the product rule for the term ∇ ∂s (Ψ c (c t , c t )v), by using the formula Proof of Theorem 3.8. For closed curves, i.e., D = S 1 , this result can be found in [10,Theorem 4.4], see also [28,6]. In the following we will focus on the case of open curves, where the proof will be slightly more involved due to the existence of a boundary.…”
Section: Incompleteness Of Constant Coefficient Metrics On Open Curvesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Proof. The first part of this result can be found in [10,Theorem 2.4], while the second part follows directly from the definition of the space…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this article we extend this analysis to the EPDiff equation on compact manifolds, which requires us to deal with inertia operators which are general Pseudo Differential operators. Simultaneously to this article, the first author and collaborators proved in [8] local well-posedness of geodesic equations for fractional order metrics on the space of immersions of a manifold M with values in another manifold N . The class of operators studied in [8] is defined via holomorphic functional calculus of the Laplace operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Simultaneously to this article, the first author and collaborators proved in [8] local well-posedness of geodesic equations for fractional order metrics on the space of immersions of a manifold M with values in another manifold N . The class of operators studied in [8] is defined via holomorphic functional calculus of the Laplace operator. In the special case of M being N their results agree with the first part of the main theorem of the present article (the local well-posedness of the geodesic equations), albeit for a different class of inertia operators and using a different method of proof (our strategy is heavily based on the group structure of D q (M ) and is valid for general abstract pseudo differential operators, see the comments below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%