1972
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(72)90018-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture problems in composite materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An up-to-day review of the general fracture problems in composite materials and a summary of some of the known results may be found in [7]. The distinguishing feature of the solutions given in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] as well as the other known solutions which appeared in literature within the past decade is that the strength of the stress singularity at the imperfection front is -1/2 and, in the case of a crack, the quasi-static stress state in the neighborhood of the crack front remains autonomous as the crack propagates. That is, aside from a slight change in a multiplicative constant known as the stress intensity factor, the asymptotic nature of the stress state in the vicinity of the crack front remains unchanged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An up-to-day review of the general fracture problems in composite materials and a summary of some of the known results may be found in [7]. The distinguishing feature of the solutions given in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] as well as the other known solutions which appeared in literature within the past decade is that the strength of the stress singularity at the imperfection front is -1/2 and, in the case of a crack, the quasi-static stress state in the neighborhood of the crack front remains autonomous as the crack propagates. That is, aside from a slight change in a multiplicative constant known as the stress intensity factor, the asymptotic nature of the stress state in the vicinity of the crack front remains unchanged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, referring to the results given in [13] with regard to the stress singularities in bonded wedges of two dissimilar elastic materials one may observe that if the adherends and the adhesive are treated as elastic continua then generally the interface stresses cr and T would have a power singularity at the end points ;l. On the other hand, if the adherends are treated as elastic continua and the adhesive is assumed to be an uncoupled tension-shear spring, then the kernels of the related integral equations would have only logarithmic singularities and consequently the stresses cr and T would be bounded everywhere, including the ends. Furthermore, the examples given in [10] and [11] show that in this case the maximum stresses are at the end points. In this sense, the condition that the (*}For some joint geometries, significant differences were observed between the two sets of calculated results.…”
Section: Discussion and The Finite Element Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primar,y factors influencing the choice of a particular idealized model for the adhesive and the adherends appear to be the adhesive-to-adherend and adherend-to-adherend thickness ratios and the ratio of the adherend thickness to the lateral joint dimensions. Thus, in [1,2] the adhesive is neglected and the adherends are treated as membranes, in [3,4] it is assumed that the adherends are membranes and the adhesive is a shear spring, in [5][6][7][8] the adherends are assumed to be plates and the adhesive a tension-shear spring, and in [9][10][11] one or both adherends are treated as an elastic continuum. One should, of course, add that by using the finite element method, it is possible to treat all three components of the adhesively bonded structure as elastic continua.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing analytical studies are, therefore, based on certain simplifying assumptions with regard to the modeling of the adhesive and the adherends. The adherends are usually modeled as an isotropic or orthotropic membrane (e.g., ['1]), plate (e.g., [2, '3]), or elastic continuum (e.g., [4,5]). The primary physical consideration, used in the selection of a particular model is generally the ratio of the thickness of the adherend to the lateral dimensions of bond region'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%