Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with ceramic inlays and different base materials

Sarıdağ, Serkan; Sarı, Tuğrul; Özyeşil, Atilla Gökhan; Aydinbelge, Hale Ari

doi:10.4012/dmj.2014-069

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Koubi et al [12] have evaluated the tolerance of Biodentine covered with a composite resin and they have stated that upon being covered with a composite, Biodentine was a suitable, efficient, and well-tolerated dentine substitute. Sarıdag et al [16] reported that the endodontically treated first molars restored using a glass-ionomer base (1071.11 N) had significantly lower mean fracture strength than those restored using a composite base (1670.37 N). Similar to our results reported by Sarıdag et al, we determined that, when a composite was applied under another composite instead of Biodentine, the fracture strength of the endodontically treated teeth significantly increased.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…[28] Hence, in several studies, the fracture strength of the restorative materials for endodontically treated teeth has been evaluated in the inlay cavities without cuspal coverage. [16,19,27] Sarıdag et al reported that cuspal coverage decreased the fracture resistance of the posterior tooth and lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic restoration complex. [28] Researchers also revealed that the teeth restored with zirconia ceramic inlays or onlays demonstrated similar fracture resistance from each other and also to that of intact teeth.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fracture strength of composite resins for endodontically treated molars

Tekçe

Pala

Demırcı

et al. 2016

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Fracture strength of composite resins for endodontically treated molars

Tekçe

Pala

Demırcı

et al. 2016

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Fracture resistance of ETT is of prime importance because a root canal‐treated tooth requires 2.5 times more load to register a proprioceptive response than a vital tooth . Metal onlays and crowns have traditionally been recommended for large restorations including cusp coverage . Although the use of indirect composite resin techniques has been indicated , studies have shown that cuspal coverage does not strengthen premolars restored with composite onlays or molars restored with ceramic restorations .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular first molars with conservative access cavity and different restorative techniques: An in vitro study

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim was to investigate in vitro the fracture resistance (FR) of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) with conservative access cavity restored using various direct and indirect restorative materials and techniques. Seventy-two mandibular first molars were equally divided into six groups. Teeth in Group 1 were untreated (controls). In Groups 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, teeth were restored with amalgam, composite resin, ceramic inlay, ceramic onlay and zirconium crown, respectively. A fracture test was performed on all teeth using a static load. Compared with other groups, teeth in Groups 3 (P < 0.05) and 6 (P < 0.05) had the highest FR values with no significant difference in-between them. Teeth in Group 4 had the lowest FR than other groups (P < 0.05). All restorative techniques tested led to a significant reduction in FR. It is necessary to consider type of fracture when evaluating fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Crowned molars had the highest favourable fractures among the five treatment groups. Although the results of this in vitro study showed variations between tested techniques in ETT with a conservative access cavity, further long-term controlled clinical trials are required to confirm these in vitro findings.

show abstract

“…The rod was centered on the occlusal surface of the restoration, and force was applied vertically until failure (14)(15)(16). The fracture strength value and fracture mode of each specimen were recorded and showed in Table 2 (17)(18)(19).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Fracture Strength and Total Void Amount in Composite Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth

Tekçe

Aydemir

Demırcı

et al. 2021

Odovtos - Int J Dent Sc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the fracture strength of different composite resins and the quantity of voids in conventional posterior composite, high-flow flowable composite, bulk-fill flowable composite, and fiber-reinforced composite. Materials and Methods: Forty-four caries-free, freshly extracted mandibular premolars were used for this study. Teeth were prepared for cavity and root canal treatment. Subsequently, root canal treatment was applied to the teeth and cavities in order to prepare them for restorations. The specimens were then divided into four groups: group-1: Estelite Posterior; group-2: Estelite Flow Quick High Flow; group-3: Estelite Bulk-fill Flow; group-4: everX Posterior. One specimen from each experimental group was examined using micro-CT to perform measurement of voids. Results: The fracture strength values of high-flow flowable, bulk-fill flowable, fiber-reinforced, and conventional micro-hybrid composites were found to be similar (p=0.497). EverX Posterior showed the highest fracture strength values (841.1±149.4 N), followed by Estelite Bulk-fill Flow (822.8±170.8 N). Conclusion: Volume of voids (%) obtained from Micro-CT analysis revealed that restorations with high-flow liner or bulk-fill flowable exhibited more voids. The fiber-reinforced composite showed the lowest percentage volume of incorporating voids and the highest fracture strength results.

show abstract

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with ceramic inlays and different base materials

Cited by 8 publications

References 31 publications

Fracture strength of composite resins for endodontically treated molars

Fracture strength of composite resins for endodontically treated molars

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular first molars with conservative access cavity and different restorative techniques: An in vitro study

Evaluation of Fracture Strength and Total Void Amount in Composite Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About