We prepared surface-modified TiO 2 nanoparticle (21 nm)/polypropylene nanocomposites using a twinscrew extruder and an injection molding machine. The TEM (transmission electron microscopy) and SEM (scanning electron microscopy) images showed homogeneous dispersion of nano-TiO 2 at 1 vol.% filler content and weak nanoparticle matrix interfacial adhesion. It was found that the essential work of fracture (EWF) approach, usually characterizing fracture toughness of ductile materials, was no longer applicable to the nanocomposite samples because of the extreme crack blunting and tearing processes observed in the EWF tests. As an alternative approach, the specific essential work-related yield was used for assessment of the plane-strain toughness, as suggested in the literature. The results indicated that the addition of 1 vol.% nano-TiO 2 did not toughen the polypropylene (PP) matrix at all. On the other hand, it was observed from the EWF tensile curves that the nanoparticles enhanced the ductility of the PP matrix greatly, the reason of which was probably ascribed to the high level of molecular orientation of the injection molded samples, as revealed by the polarized optical microscopy (POM). Because of the highly ductile behavior induced by the nanoparticles, the fracture energy achieved two-to three-fold increase, depending on the ligament lengths of the samples. The difference between the toughness and ductility of nanocomposites was discussed.Polypropylene (PP) is a ductile polymer material that develops a geometry-dependent plastic deformation zone around the crack tip, the size of which is comparable to the crack length. This kind of fracture process could not be characterized by linear elastic fracture mechanics, which is usually valid for brittle fracture. As known, one approach to determine toughness of the ductile materials is the essential work of fracture (EWF) approach [1,2]. In recent years, this approach has become popular because of its experimental simplicity in comparison with the Jintegral approach. There are some articles in which the EWF approach was successfully applied to evaluate the fracture toughness of PP and its composites [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], nevertheless it was also found that PP-based composites exhibited highly ductile fracture behavior under some factors, which include, for example, test temperature [5], sample thickness [6] and physicochemical property of the second phases adding to PP matrix [6][7][8]. This kind of highly ductile fracture behavior could not be directly evaluated by the EWF approach because of the difficulty to accurately separate the essential work from the total fracture energy. An attempt to overcome this problem has been proposed by Karger et al. [7], who divided an EWF tensile curve into two parts from the yielding point (i.e. from the peak load in EWF load-displacement curve). The yielding-related specific essential fracture work (w e,y ) appeared to agree well with the plane-strain critical EWF value. Based on this background, it is therefore poss...