1997
DOI: 10.1029/96jb02935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragmentation of basaltic melt in the course of explosive volcanism

Abstract: Abstract. With the aim to enhance interpretation of fragmentation mechanisms during explosive volcanism from size and shape characteristics of pyrodasts experimental studies have been conducted using remelted volcanic rock (olivine-melilitite). The melt was fragmented and ejected from a crucible by the controlled release of pressurized air volumes (method 1) or by controlled generation of phreatomagmatic explosions (Molten Fuel Coolant Interaction (MFCI); method 2). Both methods were adjusted so that the eject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
141
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
141
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the experimental parameters that most influence the flow velocities (initial gas pressures and host thicknesses) are chosen as to qualitatively reproduce the range of phenomena thought possible in debris-filled volcanic vents above explosion sites; we do not impose a control on flow velocities. The gas pressures were also chosen using insights gained from phreatomagmatic and "magma blowout" experiments at the same laboratory (e.g., Zimanowski et al 1991Zimanowski et al , 1997. More specifically, during blowout experiments, magma was expelled from a crucible (of the same type as the one used here) using compressed air.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the experimental parameters that most influence the flow velocities (initial gas pressures and host thicknesses) are chosen as to qualitatively reproduce the range of phenomena thought possible in debris-filled volcanic vents above explosion sites; we do not impose a control on flow velocities. The gas pressures were also chosen using insights gained from phreatomagmatic and "magma blowout" experiments at the same laboratory (e.g., Zimanowski et al 1991Zimanowski et al , 1997. More specifically, during blowout experiments, magma was expelled from a crucible (of the same type as the one used here) using compressed air.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of a maar volcano is directly related with some sort of subsidence generated by mass-deficit beneath the surface [49][50][51] as a consequence of explosive interaction between hot magma and water and/or water saturated sediments [52,53]. Maar volcanoes, gradually subside long after their formation as a result of resettling of the water-soaked debris accumulated in the volcanic conduit beneath the crater that is commonly referred to as a diatreme [54,55].…”
Section: Maarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explosive part of the recent eruption began on 14 April 2010 and lasted with interruptions until 22 May 2010 (Sigmundsson et al, 2010). The contact of meltwater from the overlying glacier with the hot magma increased the strength and explosivity of the eruption during the first days (phreatomagmatic explosion, Zimanowski et al, 1997Zimanowski et al, , 2003. The high explosive force was accompanied by the production of unusually fine ash particles with samples from the first two days showing 50 %-70 % of them being smaller than 100 µm (Sanderson, 2010;Taddeucci et al, 2011), 20 % being smaller than 10 µm and 7 % being smaller than 2.6 µm in diameter in ash samples collected close to the volcano (Gíslason and Alfredsson, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%