Water Wave Kinematics 1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0531-3_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freak Wave Kinematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account that the period of wind-generated waves is close to 10 s, we expect a freak wave event each 8 -9 hours. According to data by Sand et al (1990), maximum height of freak waves is 3H s . The probability of this event is 1.5×10 -8 , or one wave from 67,000,000 waves.…”
Section: Probabilistic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account that the period of wind-generated waves is close to 10 s, we expect a freak wave event each 8 -9 hours. According to data by Sand et al (1990), maximum height of freak waves is 3H s . The probability of this event is 1.5×10 -8 , or one wave from 67,000,000 waves.…”
Section: Probabilistic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several full-scale measurements of extremely large waves have been reported by Kjeldsen [16], Sand et al [29], Skourup et al [30], Yasuda et al [37], and Haver and Andersen [13]. These observations raised the interest in better understanding and identifying the occurrence and the nature of the non-linear interactions of sea gravity waves [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The existence of rogue waves has been verified only recently by scientific evidence, such as two striking observations in the North Sea: in 1984, a ~ 13-m-high wave was observed at the Gorm Platform (Sand et al, 1990), exceeding the significant wave height by more than a factor of two, and in 1995, the "New Year's Wave" was measured at the Draupner Platform (Taylor et al, 2006) with a trough-to-crest height of 25.6 m in seas of 12 m. In spite of an increasing number of recent rogue wave observations (e.g., Paprota et al, 2003;Dysthe et al, 2008;Didenkulova and Anderson, 2010) and all questionable data were removed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%