Free your ‘most open’ Android: a comparative discourse analysis on Android

Abstract

Through this paper, we convey a comparative analysis of how Google Inc. and the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) discursively construct and contest Android, a dominant mobile operating system. Methodologically, we use political discourse theory to engage in the textual analysis; identify and compare key signifiers and nodal points across the exemplary texts from the two actors, and interpret their meaning vis à vis contextual insights about the political economy of Android's production. Albeit being marketed as 'the first truly open platform' for mobiles, through our analysis we find Google's definition of open source practices strictly conditional. We argue that Google's usage of compatibility rhetorically as well as techno-legally justifies the conglomerate's control over the platform. By contrast, the discursive moment by free software activists, through a campaign 'Free Your Android' deconstructs the discourse on open source and attempts to politicize the access to code in the mobile domain. This is done by extending from the well-known developer's four freedoms onto users' privacy, due to personal character of mobile devices. Such articulation of free software in relation to privacy of user data is a new development and arguably has a potential to contribute to widening support to the movement.

Citizenship in comparative perspective: populism in Rio de Janeiro and in Quebec

“…It is worth mentioning that the political actors involved do not always have clear and objective definitions of what they mean by "us" and "them", leading to vague and sometimes double-interpretation uses. Mosemghvdlishvili & Jansz, 2020;Rocha & Deusdará, 2005;Maingeneau, 1997) Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is based, according to Gonçalves (2016, p. 286), on the focus on cultural forms of oppression and by offering instruments to overcome them.…”

Analisis dan Desain Sistem Informasi Rumah Kost di Salatiga dengan Pendekatan Object Oriented

“…Android bersifat open source yang source code-nya diberikan secara gratis bagi para pengembang untuk menciptakan aplikasi mereka agar dapat berjalan di Android [2]. Open yang dimaksudkan adalah kebebasan untuk melakukan kolaborasi (termasuk kebebasan dalam melakukan customization) dan dilindungi oleh open source license [7]. Sejak diluncurkan pada tahun 2007, Android telah menjadi sistem operasi mobile phone yang dominan di seluruh dunia.…”

Politics, Public Goods, and Corporate Nudging in the HTTP/2 Standardization Process

“…The organization strives to produce timely, relevant, and robust engineering standards that are widely adopted because they are deemed useful. The volunteers working for the IETF have a mutual understanding to adhere to a general rule of "rough consensus and running code" and often share an affinity toward cyberlibertarianism: As long as no one is harmed and code keeps functioning well, engineered interventions are unnecessary (Borsook, 2001;Mosemghvdlishvili & Jansz, 2020).…”