2013
DOI: 10.1080/08900523.2012.746119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freedom of Expression v. Social Responsibility: Holocaust Denial in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Davidson et al (2017) define as a language that intended to be abusive, derogatory, humiliating, or insulting. While Cohen-Almagor (2013) considers hostile and malicious speech based on innate characteristics. In general, these definitions have complementary nuances to each other.…”
Section: What Is Hate Speech?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davidson et al (2017) define as a language that intended to be abusive, derogatory, humiliating, or insulting. While Cohen-Almagor (2013) considers hostile and malicious speech based on innate characteristics. In general, these definitions have complementary nuances to each other.…”
Section: What Is Hate Speech?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It expresses discriminatory, intimidating, disapproving, antagonistic, and/or prejudicial attitudes toward those characteristics, which include gender, race, religion, ethnicity, color, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation. Hate speech is to injure, dehumanize, harass, intimidate, debase, degrade, and victimize the targeted groups and to foment insensitivity and brutality against them [13]. The hate speech is shown through the way that netizens do not support what the celebgram is doing.…”
Section: Narrative Stance Takingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some journalists have recently reconsidered their practice of objectivity when faced with such hate speech as Holocaust denial (Whine 2020). Researchers have often cast the media portrayal of Holocaust denial as a battle between authoritative sources over the truth (Cohen-Almagor 2013;Lipstadt 2012;Moldavan 2005;Zandberg 2010). Lipstadt has noted (2012) that the rise of online Holocaust denial was especially worrisome because some commentators tended to present this as a balanced view and it was attracting younger audiences.…”
Section: Objectivity Debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%