2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14726-w
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freeform micropatterning of living cells into cell culture medium using direct inkjet printing

Abstract: Microfabrication methods have widely been used to control the local cellular environment on a micron scale. However, accurately mimicking the complexity of the in vivo tissue architecture while maintaining the freedom of form and design is still a challenge when co-culturing multiple types of cells on the same substrate. For the first time, we present a drop-on-demand inkjet printing method to directly pattern living cells into a cell-friendly liquid environment. High-resolution control of cell location is ach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 52 ] revealed that cell-laden collagen gel significantly limited the transmission of cell-free HIV and shifted it to cell-associated transmission. To fabricate complex tissue-like constructs, bioprinting is a good option[ 53 ], and bioprinted models were shown not only to be susceptible to viruses but also to recapitulate virus-associated morphological patterns similar to in vivo [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Modeling Viral Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 52 ] revealed that cell-laden collagen gel significantly limited the transmission of cell-free HIV and shifted it to cell-associated transmission. To fabricate complex tissue-like constructs, bioprinting is a good option[ 53 ], and bioprinted models were shown not only to be susceptible to viruses but also to recapitulate virus-associated morphological patterns similar to in vivo [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Modeling Viral Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another bottleneck is the technical difficulty printing more than one cell type poses, for which many studies have only used a single cell type. Addressing the latter, an increasing number of publications report bioprinting of various cell types recently [37,43,44]. This approach, however, is associated with some problems such as special needs of each cell type with regard to the bioink and the necessity to establish suitable co-culture conditions after the printing itself for tissue maturation.…”
Section: Conventional Tissue Engineering (Te) Approaches and 3d Bioprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present method simply achieved cell micropatterning by exposure of the modified surface to light patterns without complicated MEMS technologies, such as micro-molds, microwells, and microstructures, and expensive machines such as ink-jet printers. Compared with other cell micropatterning methods, such as microcontact printing [27] and ink-jet printing [28], no direct access to the substrate surface is required for placing ligands or cells. Accordingly, this surface can simplify the procedure for creating a cell micropattern in a closed microdevice such as microchannels.…”
Section: Cell Micropatterning and Selective Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%