2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00706-016-1853-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and use of pharmaceuticals in selected Slovakian town via wastewater analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharmaceuticals and personal care products are also called “emerging organic contaminants” [10, 24, 2833]. Concentrations of pharmaceuticals in wastewater are generally in the range of 1–0.001 µg/dm 3 and their presence in sewage sludge and processed wastewater may be a potential hazard for the environment [34]. Nowadays, the most popular chromatographic methods for analysis of such pollutants in sewage sludge are gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), GC–MS/MS, and high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS) [35, 36].…”
Section: Analytical Methods Used For the Development Of Sewage Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pharmaceuticals and personal care products are also called “emerging organic contaminants” [10, 24, 2833]. Concentrations of pharmaceuticals in wastewater are generally in the range of 1–0.001 µg/dm 3 and their presence in sewage sludge and processed wastewater may be a potential hazard for the environment [34]. Nowadays, the most popular chromatographic methods for analysis of such pollutants in sewage sludge are gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), GC–MS/MS, and high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS) [35, 36].…”
Section: Analytical Methods Used For the Development Of Sewage Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is worth mentioning that with the use of SPE and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) it is possible to determine a vast variety of antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, clarithromycin), analgesics (diclofenac), antithrombotics (dipyridamole), antifungals (fluconazole, clotrimazole), antihistaminics (fexofenadine, meclozine), cardiovascular drugs (eprosartan, telmisartan, valsartan), and psychostimulants (tramadol, carbamazepine) in influent wastewater during one analytical procedure. Moreover, the range of analysis, so the lowest and the highest determinable concentrations of abovementioned individuals (2 µg/dm 3 of clotrimazole to 2270 µg/dm 3 of telmisartan) can be considered as satisfactorily wide [34]. The same analytical technique was used for the analysis of 30 psychoactive pharmaceuticals, illegal drugs and their metabolites 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA), N -methyl-1,3-benzodioxolylbutanamine (MBDB), cotinine, methamphetamine, amphetamine, 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH), cocaine, benzoylecgonine, cathinone, codeine, risperidone, oxycodone, 6-acetylmorphine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 2-oxy-3-hydroxy-LSD (OH-LSD), ketamine, norketamine, mephedrone, methylphenidate, tramadol, midazolam, venlafaxine, oxazepam, citalopram, buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP, methadone) in hospital effluents and wastewater after treatment [37].…”
Section: Analytical Methods Used For the Development Of Sewage Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, 60–95% MTX; 25–45% ETP and TOP; 5–15% PAC, DTX, CTX and DOX; 15–25% IRI; up to 80% ALK [ 18 , 32 , 33 ]. Furthermore, most of the selected target analytes were reported to have been detected and quantified in surface waters, and urban and hospital wastewaters (influents and effluents) in fairly low to medium concentrations, including 1.6–300 ng L −1 MTX [ 19 , 24 , 27 , 34 ], 18.5–100 ng L −1 PTX [ 3 , 27 ], 9.0–10 ng L −1 MAP [ 35 , 36 ], 2.5–2.7 ng L −1 DOX [ 27 ], 0.4–60 ng L −1 IRI [ 25 , 27 , 30 , 34 ], 3.4–15 ng L −1 ETP [ 25 ], 0.4–1900 ng L −1 ALK [ 37 ], 97.7–175.1 ng L −1 DTX [ 3 ]. Once they enter the aquatic environment, these compounds can produce transformation products whose effects are merely known [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of WBE has been mostly adopted to estimate illicit-and other drugs of abuse (DOA) trends in communities and comparing them with similar WBE studies worldwide (Archer et al, 2018;Castiglioni and Vandam, 2016;Castrignanò et al, 2016;Devault et al, 2017;Emke et al, 2014;Evans et al, 2016;Fallati et al, 2020;Lai et al, 2017;Ort et al, 2014;Petrie et al, 2016b;Subedi and Kannan, 2014;Xu et al, 2017). Moreover, WBE has been extended to include the profiling of other public health-related issues such as alcohol abuse, pesticide use patterns, and other pharmaceutical product use patterns (Baker et al, 2014;Baz-Lomba et al, 2016;Been et al, 2018;Castiglioni et al, 2020Castiglioni et al, , 2018Fáberová et al, 2017;Lopardo et al, 2019;Papageorgiou et al, 2016;Yuan et al, 2016;Zuccato et al, 2010), of which the latter can provide valuable information on public health. For this reason, this approach can provide valuable information in LMICs, where data is limited, as opposed to HICs where information may be more readily available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%