Biomedical Engineering I 1982
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-028826-0.50079-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency Dependence of Ultrasonic Characteristics of Cancellous Bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then in a wider frequency range covering 0.3~3MHz, positive dispersion was found, which agrees with the results in this paper. Similar positive dispersion results were also found in skull diploe [26], in cancellous bone [27] and in tissue-like polymers [28]. However, it is interesting that negative velocity dispersion was also found by some studies, such as the research in [29] and [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Then in a wider frequency range covering 0.3~3MHz, positive dispersion was found, which agrees with the results in this paper. Similar positive dispersion results were also found in skull diploe [26], in cancellous bone [27] and in tissue-like polymers [28]. However, it is interesting that negative velocity dispersion was also found by some studies, such as the research in [29] and [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…그러나 Fry 및 Barger는 사람 의 두개골을 이용하여 제작된 해면질골 샘플에서 fast wave 및 slow wave가 서로 중첩된 신호에서 양 의 분산을 발견하였다 [13] . 또한 Pal 등도 이와 유 사하게 양의 분산을 보고하였으며, Droin 등은 사 람의 해면질골에서 음 또는 양의 분산을 모두 관 찰할 수 있었다 [14,15] . 현재까지도 해면질골에서 MHz의 주파수 범위에서 감쇠계수가 주파수 에 대해   의 의존성을 보이는 것을 관찰하였다 [16] .…”
Section: 대상 및 방법unclassified
“…Strelitzki et al investigated the influence of porosity and pore size using a Leeds ultrasonic bone phantom and reported that UV in trabecular bone is dependent on porosity but independent of pore size [25]. The negative dispersion was observed in calcaneal cancellous bone with much lower bone mass [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], whereas positive velocity dispersion was reported by Pal et al and Fry and Barger in skull cancellous bone specimens with an ultrasound between 0.3 and 2.0 MHz [34,35]. The negative dispersion was explained by multiple scattering [30] or by interference of fast and slow waves predicted by Biot theory [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%