1988
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1988.0070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-dependent selection, metrical characters and molecular evolution

Abstract: Computer models of selection acting on a quantitative character show that a combination of frequency-dependent and stabilizing selection can maintain many polymorphisms among the genes that determine the character. The models also show that the random order of mutations can give rise to selectively driven stochastic effects that are sometimes more important than random genetic drift. They suggest simple explanations for patterns of divergence between populations and species, and for apparent discrepancies betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conditions to maintain genetic polymorphisms within populations are fairly restrictive, relying on some degree or combination of frequency-dependent selection, overdominance, and overlapping generations (Felsenstein 1976). Besides G × E interactions, frequency-dependent selection represents a powerful, alternative mechanism to maintain polymorphisms in natural populations (Ayala and Campbell 1974;Clarke et al 1988). For example, color polymorphisms in male guppies are maintained by negative frequency-dependent selection mediated by female mate choice (Hughes et al 2013) and a survival advantage of rare males (Olendorf et al 2006).…”
Section: Limitations and Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditions to maintain genetic polymorphisms within populations are fairly restrictive, relying on some degree or combination of frequency-dependent selection, overdominance, and overlapping generations (Felsenstein 1976). Besides G × E interactions, frequency-dependent selection represents a powerful, alternative mechanism to maintain polymorphisms in natural populations (Ayala and Campbell 1974;Clarke et al 1988). For example, color polymorphisms in male guppies are maintained by negative frequency-dependent selection mediated by female mate choice (Hughes et al 2013) and a survival advantage of rare males (Olendorf et al 2006).…”
Section: Limitations and Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of balancing selectionincluding negative frequency-dependent selection, spatial or temporal habitat heterogeneity, and heterozygote advantage-provide theoretical frameworks describing the processes that can account for persistent polymorphisms within populations. A core tenet of each balancing selection model is that the selective value of an allele-whether it is beneficial or detrimental-is dependent on the environmental context (Dobzhansky, 1982;Clarke et al, 1988). That is, alleles are advantageous and deleterious in different circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of balancing selection -including negative frequency-dependent selection, spatial or temporal habitat heterogeneity, and heterozygote advantage -provide theoretical frameworks of the processes that can account for persistent polymorphisms within populations. A core tenet of each balancing selection model is that the selective value of an allele -whether it is beneficial or detrimentalis dependent on the environmental context [12,13]. That is, alleles are advantageous and deleterious in different ecological contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%