2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friction coefficients in cold forging: A global perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This differentiates the SCT from other tribometers such as the Double Cup Extrusion Test [18], the Ring Compression Test [19] or the Spike Test [20]. Results derived from the SCT are in good quantitative agreement with results gained with other tribometers [21].…”
Section: Test Setupsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This differentiates the SCT from other tribometers such as the Double Cup Extrusion Test [18], the Ring Compression Test [19] or the Spike Test [20]. Results derived from the SCT are in good quantitative agreement with results gained with other tribometers [21].…”
Section: Test Setupsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The frictional force is reduced in order to smoothly maintain the surface properties of the tool and the workpiece, and to allow for constant maintenance of the lubricating film during metal forming. In forming, as a result of plastic deformation, sliding of a newly born surface occurs, so the description scheme of the transition state is a major task of friction modeling [72]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Friction Models and Gallingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groche et al have recently presented a systematic evaluation of six established tribometers: the ring compression test with boss (RCT-B), the combined forward rod backward can extrusion test (CFRBCET), the backwards cup extrusion test (BCET), the backward can extrusion with simultaneous rotation test (BCERT), the upsetting sliding test (UST), and the sliding compression test (SCT). A typical tribological system for cold forging operations, consisting of a zinc-phosphate conversion layer and polymer on blasted specimens (SAE 5115) with a combined lubricant layer weight of w = 22 g/m 2 , was chosen [7]. Four tribological loads were chosen according to Bay et al [8]: the contact normal stress σ n , the relative sliding velocity v rel , the surface enlargement ψ and the temperature T.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Friction Measurement In Cold Bulk Metal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjustment of the tribological loads of different tribometers with the sliding compression test leads to a high accordance regarding the resulting friction coefficients, showing that for the given tribological system, the reproduction of tribological loads within different tribometers yields the same friction coefficients. Using the attained medium friction coefficient within the numerical simulation of the reference extrusion process (for a more in-detail description of the extrusion operation, see [9]) with the same tribological system, allows to reproduce the force-displacement-trend very well [7]. The adjustment of the tribological loads of different tribometers with the sliding compression test leads to a high accordance regarding the resulting friction coefficients, showing that for the given tribological system, the reproduction of tribological loads within different tribometers yields the same friction coefficients.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Friction Measurement In Cold Bulk Metal mentioning
confidence: 99%