2020
DOI: 10.1108/rpj-06-2019-0171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frictional characteristics of Fusion Deposition Modeling (FDM) manufactured surfaces

Abstract: Purpose Additive manufacturing (AM) is a promising alternative to the conventional production methods (i.e., machining), providing the developers with great geometrical and topological freedom during the design and immediate prototyping customizability. However, frictional characteristics of the AM surfaces are yet to be fully explored, making the control and manufacturing of precise assembly manufactured mechanisms (i.e., robots) c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations of dimensions are an essential requirement for the improvement of any manufacturing process. If it will not be considered, then attaining the interchangeability will not be possible (Sojoodi Farimani et al , 2020). During batch production, a random number of factors may cause the dimensional deviation among all these unexpected causes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variations of dimensions are an essential requirement for the improvement of any manufacturing process. If it will not be considered, then attaining the interchangeability will not be possible (Sojoodi Farimani et al , 2020). During batch production, a random number of factors may cause the dimensional deviation among all these unexpected causes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of the interacted interfaces is a function of the nature of solid, interaction of the surfaces, environment and the method of fabrication. Surface properties directly affect the area in contact, leading to an effect on the lubrication, frictional behavior and wear rate (Sojoodi Farimani et al , 2020; Mishra et al , 2017). Surface properties also affect thermal performance, physical appearance and electrical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plotted experimental cycles demonstrate a volumetric energy loss between 0.520 and 0.638 kJ m −3 with an average loss of 0.566 kJ m −3 . With an adjusted friction coefficient of 0.158 for the chosen material, the finite element results produced an energy dissipation per material volume of 0.567 kJ m −3 , [ 34 ] meaning the cycles dissipated 8.3% less to 12.5% more energy per material volume than the simulation.…”
Section: D Printing and Testing Of Metamaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plotted experimental cycles demonstrate a volumetric energy loss between 0.520 and 0.638 kJ m −3 with an average loss of 0.566 kJ m −3 . With an adjusted friction coefficient of 0.158 for the chosen material, the finite element results produced an energy dissipation per material volume of 0.567 kJ m −3 , [34] meaning the cycles The difference in the simulated and experimental curves is attributed to modeling simplifications and manufacturing tolerances. The finite element model assumed a linear, isotropic material and a linear tangential contact model (Section 3).…”
Section: D Printing and Testing Of Metamaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the unique features of AM, such as, its capability for designing parts of higher geometrical and topological complexities and also its lower time and costs requirements for low‐volume and customized production. [ 4 ] One of the most common AM techniques is fused deposition modeling (FDM), in which the filament of a suitable polymer is extruded though a nozzle and deposited layer‐by‐layer on a build plate. [ 5,6 ] The most widely used materials in FDM are poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) (ABS) plastics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%