2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.07.05.498792
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From behaviour to complex communities: Resilience to anthropogenic noise in a fish-induced trophic cascade

Abstract: SUMMARYSound emissions from human activities represent a pervasive environmental stressor. Individual responses in terms of behaviour, physiology or anatomy are well documented but whether they propagate through nested ecological interactions to alter complex communities needs to be better understood. This is even more relevant for freshwater ecosystems that harbour a disproportionate fraction of biodiversity but receive less attention than marine and terrestrial systems. We conducted a mesocosm investigation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…: it allows them to find food, to escape to predators, and more generally to do their diel migration (Larsson & Kleiven, 1996; Dodson et al, 1997; O’Keefe et al, 1998; Roozen & Lürling, 2001; Chang & Hanazato, 2003). This prediction is consistent with a lower abundance of daphniids in a zooplankton community exposed to chronic boat noise (Rojas et al, 2022), despite the absence of observed effects by Prosnier et al (2022) with chronic boat noise, but asks how other zooplankton species are affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…: it allows them to find food, to escape to predators, and more generally to do their diel migration (Larsson & Kleiven, 1996; Dodson et al, 1997; O’Keefe et al, 1998; Roozen & Lürling, 2001; Chang & Hanazato, 2003). This prediction is consistent with a lower abundance of daphniids in a zooplankton community exposed to chronic boat noise (Rojas et al, 2022), despite the absence of observed effects by Prosnier et al (2022) with chronic boat noise, but asks how other zooplankton species are affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The first one is to continue to investigate how noise affects organisms: which noise (acute or chronic, continuous or not, various frequency …) affect which organism (hearing species, zooplankton) in which way (behaviour and fitness) through which mechanism (physiology, environmental perception, ability to prey) (Duarte et al, 2021). The second one is the impact on more complex system, as a food web, with various organisms that are not similarly impacted by a type of noise (see for instance Rojas et al, 2022). As for other pollutants, these studies seem mandatory to understand how anthropogenic noises could affect ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these well-known effects, there is a signi cant gap in our understanding of how antropophony affects freshwater ecosystems (Gammell and O'Brien 2013). To date, there are fewer than a dozen articles that have focused on studying the effects of anthropophony on freshwater animals (for example Amoser and Ladich 2010; Desjonquères et al 2020; Rojas et al 2023). This lack of knowledge emerges prominently as freshwater ecosystems are among the most threatened by human activity (Dudgeon et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%