2012
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2012.715533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Centralized Interactive Tabletops to Distributed Surfaces: The Tangiget Concept

Abstract: After having outlined the uses of new technologies such as smartphones, touch-screen tablets, and laptops, this article presents the TangiSense interactive tabletop, equipped with RFID technology tagged on tangible objects, as a new paradigm of interaction for ambient intelligence. Within its framework, this article aims to distribute surfaces (tables) interacting mainly with tangible objects. Leads for interactive surface distribution such as interactive tables are given. The article proposes to describe some… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TangiSence is equipped with Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID; Finkenzeller, 2003) which also permits tangible (Ishii, & Ullmer, 1997) objects detection (Lebrun, Adam, Mandiau, & Kolski, 2015;Baudisch, Becker, & Rudeck, 2010;Jordà, Geiger, Alonso, & Kaltenbrunner, 2007). We can also note that some new research aims to propose distributed interface using interactive tabletops (Jetter, Zöllner, Gerken, & Reiterer, 2012;Lepreux, Kubicki, Kolski, & Caelen, 2012;Kolski et al, 2014).Given the multidimensional aspects, concerns regarding interference are relevant, as perceptual and conceptual conflicts could impact user performance (Hapeshi & Jones, 1992).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TangiSence is equipped with Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID; Finkenzeller, 2003) which also permits tangible (Ishii, & Ullmer, 1997) objects detection (Lebrun, Adam, Mandiau, & Kolski, 2015;Baudisch, Becker, & Rudeck, 2010;Jordà, Geiger, Alonso, & Kaltenbrunner, 2007). We can also note that some new research aims to propose distributed interface using interactive tabletops (Jetter, Zöllner, Gerken, & Reiterer, 2012;Lepreux, Kubicki, Kolski, & Caelen, 2012;Kolski et al, 2014).Given the multidimensional aspects, concerns regarding interference are relevant, as perceptual and conceptual conflicts could impact user performance (Hapeshi & Jones, 1992).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to couple the different model parts, however, raises some challenges with regard to model consistency and user interaction. Distributed manipulation of models has been addressed regarding user interfaces design to support interaction across different devices [12] but not with a focus on distributing and coupling the manipulated content so far. The conceptual challenges are not limited to tangible tabletop systems but are equally existent in other modeling environments that distribute models across several digital or physical surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NUIs are also expected to replace traditional interactions using the currently normal combination of windows, icons, menus, and pointing devices, because they provide users with a more realistic and pleasant experience than windows, icons, menus, and pointing devices. For example, users can directly manipulate objects with various hand motions instead of using a mouse button to select an icon or menu (Bjørneseth, Dunlop, & Hornecker, 2012;Jetter, Zöllner, Gerken, & Reiterer, 2012;Lepreux, Kubicki, Kolski, & Caelen, 2012;Radhakrishnan, Lin, Zeid, & Kamarthi, 2013;Villanueva, Tesoriero, & Lozano, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%