2013 Latin American Robotics Symposium and Competition 2013
DOI: 10.1109/lars.2013.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Reactive to Cognitive Agents: Extending Reinforcement Learning to Generate Symbolic Knowledge Bases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of a cognitive architecture with successful applications in robotics is the Concurrent Autonomous Agent (CAA), an autonomous agent architecture for mobile robots that has already proven to be very powerful [5][6][7]. This agent possesses a three layer architecture, in which each layer is responsible for a different task: the reactive layer runs behaviours with a perception-action cycle; the instinctive layer coordinates reactive behaviour selection; and the cognitive layer does the high-level planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a cognitive architecture with successful applications in robotics is the Concurrent Autonomous Agent (CAA), an autonomous agent architecture for mobile robots that has already proven to be very powerful [5][6][7]. This agent possesses a three layer architecture, in which each layer is responsible for a different task: the reactive layer runs behaviours with a perception-action cycle; the instinctive layer coordinates reactive behaviour selection; and the cognitive layer does the high-level planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of architecture for cognitive agents is the concurrent autonomous agent (CAA), an autonomous agent architecture for mobile robots that has already proven to be very powerful [5][6][7]. Three parallel levels compose this architecture: the reactive, the instinctive and the cognitive levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%