From social management to social governance: social conflict mediation in China

Abstract

China currently faces increasingly serious social conflicts. In the past, China's approach to resolving social conflicts was ‘social management’. Now, however, it is turning to the development of ‘social governance’. This change reflects the inability of government acting alone to recognise and to address comprehensively the type of social problems that require co‐ordination of social forces. Our research identifies three dimensions of governance and provides a comparative framework allowing us to illuminate how social governance as conceived in China differs from that in Western countries. Under China's current conditions, the strengthening and development of social governance is a holistic process. Neither market‐centrism nor state‐centrism is pursued, and pure social‐centrism is not the favoured direction of development; the path chosen is rather a state‐led social pluralism. The implications we see for the Government are that it should first transform its own functions to achieve a substantially higher quality of public service. This would put it in a position to empower (civil) society to mobilise multiple and varied social forces to participate so that social conflict can be optimally addressed. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Does e-readiness of citizens ensure better adoption of government’s digital initiatives? A case based study

“…The outcome of the e-government initiatives proved to be positive as the citizen's perception of government's ability of service delivery improved ( Jun et al, 2014). E-governance worked as a social conflict mediation mechanism and helped China to transform from social management to social governance (Liu, 2014). In Indonesia the primary objective of e-government implementation was to curb the corruption especially at political level and reduce poverty (Ionescu, 2013).…”

Intelligent Big Data Framework for the Technical Design of Public Management Applications in Sports

“…Along with the implementation of a comprehensive fitness programmed outline on the basis of China's comprehensive economic, cultural, and social development, the aim is to meet the people's growing demand for sports, their pursuit of quality of life, their increased attention to sports and physical exercise, and their increasingly diverse requirements for public management of sports [1]. At the same time, China's government management is moving towards public service government management, and public services are something that governments at all levels attach great importance to [2]. Only by improving the public service management system can we provide more efficient and convenient public service content for the people [3,4].…”

Tourism governance in post-war transition: The case of Kosova

“…This is because the description 'from government to governance' is similar to arguing that there has been a shift from institutions to actions, an untenable proposition. According to Liu (2014), there are different types of governance from hierarchical to community governance. Therefore, the term governance on its own does not indicate the type of governing.…”

“…Figure 6. aims to make appropriate distinctions using some of the definitions and terms of governance discussed above (Benz, 2007;Kjaer, 2004;Kluvánková-Oravská et al, 2009;Liu, 2014;Mayntz, 2003;Newman and Clarke, 2009;Pierre and Peters, 2005;Rosenau, 1992). The phrase 'governance' is viewed as an umbrella (Newman, 2007), that encompasses various expressions used in coordinated processes of decision-making between a network of stakeholders (state and non-state) at the planning and at the implementation stages of authority including in public administration, policy and planning, sociology, and political science (Kooiman and Bavinck, 2013).…”

“…Definitions are reciprocated by scholars in order to incorporate all aspects of the model. While Yee (2004: 487) Liu, 2014). This is because they are not perceived to be authoritative approaches of 'power over others', but rather 'service providers' applied together in collaboration and sharing 'power with others' (Raman, 2012).…”