2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(02)00046-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the basic mechanics of orthogonal metal cutting toward the identification of the constitutive equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
116
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
116
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation could explain the rule of the thumb when machining of CFRP: high cutting speed and low feed rate. Tounsi et al, (2002) found similar results and they showed that under this condition (minimum feed and maximum cutting speed), it was much easier to soften low quantities of CFRP with the generated heat due to friction. In terms of energy consumption, Test 3 (maximum feed rate and minimum cutting speed) had the highest level of cutting forces and the CNC machine consumed more energy while Test 1 (minimum feed and maximum cutting speed) had the lowest level of cutting forces and the CNC machine consumed less energy during tool life experiments.…”
Section: Cutting Forces Analysissupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This observation could explain the rule of the thumb when machining of CFRP: high cutting speed and low feed rate. Tounsi et al, (2002) found similar results and they showed that under this condition (minimum feed and maximum cutting speed), it was much easier to soften low quantities of CFRP with the generated heat due to friction. In terms of energy consumption, Test 3 (maximum feed rate and minimum cutting speed) had the highest level of cutting forces and the CNC machine consumed more energy while Test 1 (minimum feed and maximum cutting speed) had the lowest level of cutting forces and the CNC machine consumed less energy during tool life experiments.…”
Section: Cutting Forces Analysissupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This penalizes numerical analysts who use phenomenological and very simple models (such as the Johnson-Cook model [17]) [26], the identification of which requires only a few tests [5,27] and that have a limited range of validity, which is more restrictive than the range of the rheological parameters observed in machining or forging operations. Also, it is possible to find in the literature different values of the same model parameters for identical materials [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available studies are based on experimental data which is often very limited. In general a minimum number of tests are done in order to identify the chosen constitutive model without comparing its domain of validity with the loads applied to the material during machining [5] or forging [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nasr et al [49] showed a considerable increase in residual stresses when initial yield stress (A) decreases and when the strain hardening parameters (B and n) increase. Some authors recommend, in the absence of any dedicated mechanical test method for describing the flow stress, the use of metal cutting results (cutting forces and chip morphology) to fit the constants of the Jonhson-Cook law [50]. In the present work the same approach was followed, starting from values proposed by other authors and proposing a new set that fits the values of cutting forces obtained experimentally (see Table 1).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 96%