2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From time representation in scheduling to the solution of strip packing problems

Abstract: We propose two mixed-integer linear programming based approaches for the 2-D orthogonal strip packing problem. Using knowledge from the alternative forms of time representation in scheduling formulations, we show how to efficiently combine three different concepts into the x-and ydimensions. One model features a discrete representation on the x-axis (strip width) and a continuous representation with general precedence variables on the y-axis (strip height). The other features a full continuous-space representa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is one cross-plant pipeline from Plant 1 to Plant 3 (stream F 1,14,1 ), and the possible cross-plant flows such as streams F 19,7,1 , F 19,11,13 , and F 20,11,1 could be shared with either stream F 14,9,2 or F 14,10,2 in the common pipelines from Plant 3 to Plant 2. Next, total five common cross-plant pipelines are built as shown by stream flows F 1,9,1 , F 1,14,1 , F 5,11,1 , F 14,9,2 , and F 14,10,2 (see Figure 9).…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is one cross-plant pipeline from Plant 1 to Plant 3 (stream F 1,14,1 ), and the possible cross-plant flows such as streams F 19,7,1 , F 19,11,13 , and F 20,11,1 could be shared with either stream F 14,9,2 or F 14,10,2 in the common pipelines from Plant 3 to Plant 2. Next, total five common cross-plant pipelines are built as shown by stream flows F 1,9,1 , F 1,14,1 , F 5,11,1 , F 14,9,2 , and F 14,10,2 (see Figure 9).…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, both batch and continuous processes are influenced by process- and market-related uncertainties including seasonal product demand, scheduled plant shutdown, and expansion plans of plant capacity. In adaptation to the above transient scenarios, several methods such as Petri-net based, timed automata, S-graph, strip packing, and mathematical programming techniques have been proposed to achieve an optimum scheduling plan for the transient production. These scheduling plans would result in the change of the process demand as the total demand could be increased, be decreased, or remain unchanged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Castro and Oliveira (2011) proposed a formulation based on a hybrid discrete and continuous-space, inspired by scheduling models. In a similar approach of time representation, Castro and Grossmann (2012) proposed a new hybrid discrete and continuous-space formulation which was able to find and prove more optimal solutions than the previous DCS proposed by Castro and Oliveira (2011). Block heuristics have also been considered and developed in the area of pallet loading, including G4-and G5-structures as in Lim, Ma, Xu and Zhang (2012) and Scheithauer and Terno (1996b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, mathematical programming techniques were widely employed to determine optimal schedules and plans in a variety of engineering fields, such as plant production, job manufacturing, product transportation, process safety, and so on. As to unit maintenance management, the proactive scheduling of PM is to determine the integrated schedule of production and maintenance prior to failure emerging, in which PM is well coordinated with normal operations. According to different maintenance policies, proactive scheduling has been extensively investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%