2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94162-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal midline theta differentiates separate cognitive control strategies while still generalizing the need for cognitive control

Abstract: Cognitive control processes encompass many distinct components, including response inhibition (stopping a prepotent response), proactive control (using prior information to enact control), reactive control (last-minute changing of a prepotent response), and conflict monitoring (choosing between two competing responses). While frontal midline theta activity is theorized to be a general marker of the need for cognitive control, a stringent test of this hypothesis would require a quantitative, within-subject comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We interpreted global increases in frontal-midline theta power as indicative of the higher need for cognitive control during memory suppression relative to voluntary retrieval, based on a well supported hypothesis about the role of this EEG marker ( Cavanagh and Frank, 2014 ). However, recent findings indicate that, although on average frontal-midline theta power is higher for conditions that require more cognitive control (here No-Think) relative to control conditions (e.g., Think), and correlate with slower behavior, increased frontal-midline theta power also indexes the extent to which control is engaged ( Eisma et al, 2021 ). Particularly, in trial-by-trial analyses focused within a condition, more theta predicts higher control engagement and faster responses on a task requiring inhibitory control ( Cooper et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We interpreted global increases in frontal-midline theta power as indicative of the higher need for cognitive control during memory suppression relative to voluntary retrieval, based on a well supported hypothesis about the role of this EEG marker ( Cavanagh and Frank, 2014 ). However, recent findings indicate that, although on average frontal-midline theta power is higher for conditions that require more cognitive control (here No-Think) relative to control conditions (e.g., Think), and correlate with slower behavior, increased frontal-midline theta power also indexes the extent to which control is engaged ( Eisma et al, 2021 ). Particularly, in trial-by-trial analyses focused within a condition, more theta predicts higher control engagement and faster responses on a task requiring inhibitory control ( Cooper et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 , 35 Jarrod et al Found that target conditions requiring more cognitive control elicited higher power theta activity in the frontal midline compared to control conditions. 36 Wang et al Used a two-choice Oddball task to study the behavioral inhibition of individuals at different altitudes, they found that theta power of deviant stimuli was significantly higher than that of standard stimuli, with individuals at higher altitudes requiring longer response times and electrophysiologically exhibiting lower P3 amplitude and theta power. 37 The results of the present study are consistent with this, with deviant stimuli triggering higher power theta bands in the frontal midline compared to standard stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somatomotor beta bursts, the motor inhibitory mechanism underlying PTSD-relevant cognitive control deficits, might also be under the control of executive brain regions via cross-frequency interactions (for example frontal midline theta). In healthy controls, but not individuals with PTSD, somatomotor beta activity was linked to prefrontal theta-band activation (Cohen et al, 2013) – a common substrate underlying multiple types of cognitive control (Cavanagh et al, 2012; Cavanagh & Frank, 2014; Eisma et al, 2021). Furthermore, in a sample of trauma-exposed veterans, increased cognitive control-related brain activation in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a key brain region regulating cognitive control computations (Botvinick, 2007; Botvinick et al, 2004; Gehring & Knight, 2000; Sohn et al, 2007), was associated with reduced PTSD symptom severity (White et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%