2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11804-014-1253-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully nonlinear simulation for fluid/structure impact: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, other variations of the BEM have been developed such as Sun and Faltinsen (2009)'s BEM with a flow separation model and Cheng et al (2018)'s higher-order BEM. However, the BEM has challenges on the viscous flows and the breaking waves, due to the assumption of the inviscid, irrotational fluid (Sun and Wu, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, other variations of the BEM have been developed such as Sun and Faltinsen (2009)'s BEM with a flow separation model and Cheng et al (2018)'s higher-order BEM. However, the BEM has challenges on the viscous flows and the breaking waves, due to the assumption of the inviscid, irrotational fluid (Sun and Wu, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models have been applied to simulated tsunami generation and [1] overturning waves [2][3][4], to design breakwaters [5,6], to predict the wave pressure impact on structures [7], or to study radiation and diffraction waves produced by a wave-maker [8][9][10][11]. Nowadays, because of the increasing interest on the ocean renewable energy, in which the generation systems are installed near-shore or off-shore, new applications of such models are being used to study the fluid-structure interaction considering the effect of the waves [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%