2019
DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1684581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional capacity of elderly with lower-limb amputation after prosthesis rehabilitation: a longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower extremity amputation is defined as the complete loss in the transverse anatomical plane of any part of the lower limb and can be divided into major (above ankle, through knee, and up to hip amputations) and minor (foot and toes) amputations (Nather and Wong, 2013;Ang et al, 2017;Chan et al, 2019). Diabetic lower extremity amputation (DLEA) is a major surgical procedure performed in patients with diabetes and generally disruptive to patients' normal life and can have a profound and lasting impact on an individual's physical and functional capacity and quality of life (Liu et al, 2010;Holzer et al, 2014;Barg et al, 2017;Silva et al, 2019). Amputation-related physical inabilities affect patients' daily activities of living and their social roles and identities, which often leave them with a sense of dependency and powerlessness (Chini and Boemer, 2007;Sousa et al, 2009;Livingstone et al, 2011;Senra et al, 2012;Foster and Lauver, 2014;Grech and Debono, 2014;Washington and Williams, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lower extremity amputation is defined as the complete loss in the transverse anatomical plane of any part of the lower limb and can be divided into major (above ankle, through knee, and up to hip amputations) and minor (foot and toes) amputations (Nather and Wong, 2013;Ang et al, 2017;Chan et al, 2019). Diabetic lower extremity amputation (DLEA) is a major surgical procedure performed in patients with diabetes and generally disruptive to patients' normal life and can have a profound and lasting impact on an individual's physical and functional capacity and quality of life (Liu et al, 2010;Holzer et al, 2014;Barg et al, 2017;Silva et al, 2019). Amputation-related physical inabilities affect patients' daily activities of living and their social roles and identities, which often leave them with a sense of dependency and powerlessness (Chini and Boemer, 2007;Sousa et al, 2009;Livingstone et al, 2011;Senra et al, 2012;Foster and Lauver, 2014;Grech and Debono, 2014;Washington and Williams, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aspects emphasise the challenge and complexity of the rehabilitation phase of major DLEA after wound healing. Many research studies have also explored rehabilitation of patients with major amputation (Chini and Boemer, 2007;Sousa et al, 2009;Senra et al, 2012;Grech and Debono, 2014;Silva et al, 2019). Little is known about the early stages of DLEA where patients may have to grapple with potential slow-healing post-amputation wounds and cope with physical and psychosocial stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rehabilitation in geriatric amputate is always challenging (Silva et al, 2019). Bachmann et al(2010) have found that comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) leads to improved detection and documentation of geriatric problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elderly people with a lower-limb amputation would facing a heavy burden on health resources, requiring comprehensive rehabilitation program and long-term care. The special characteristic of geriatric with lower-limb amputation, with multiple physical, psychological, cognitive, and social comorbidities, imposes unique challenges to ongoing rehabilitation care (Silva et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,[11][12][13][14] The quantitative studies measured prothesis use at different times ranging from discharge to 15 months after rehabilitation and their results varied both in terms of the quantity and quality of prosthesis use. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] For instance, some studies found a declined of use 6,10 restricted functioning in mobility, 10 leisure and social role such as employment, 8, 9 and limited autonomy outdoors while others 7-8 reported increase prosthesis use overtime and higher functioning in activities of daily living. A qualitative meta-synthesis 13 of the literature reported that most studies focused on adaptation to the amputation and the prosthesis, the role of social relationships, and the impact of the prosthesis on identity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%