1953
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.6.634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Characteristics of Afferent Fibers From Tooth Pulp of Cat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are con sistent with the observations that the reflex jaw opening in the cat was induced not only from the lowest threshold fibers in the trigeminal nerve (Aa fibers) (1, 3, 4), but also from Ad fibers (6, 7) containing the tooth pulp (2, 5) which consists exclusively of the small my elinated fibers of 1-7 ,u in diameter (Ay-d fibers) (8).…”
Section: Two Components Of the Jaw Opening Reflexsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are con sistent with the observations that the reflex jaw opening in the cat was induced not only from the lowest threshold fibers in the trigeminal nerve (Aa fibers) (1, 3, 4), but also from Ad fibers (6, 7) containing the tooth pulp (2, 5) which consists exclusively of the small my elinated fibers of 1-7 ,u in diameter (Ay-d fibers) (8).…”
Section: Two Components Of the Jaw Opening Reflexsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…(l, 3, 4, 7) and those of Group Ill (Ad) (2,(5)(6)(7). Analgesics such as morphine increased the threshold for this reflex to the stimulation of tooth pulp, which consists exclusively of Ay-o fibers in cats (8), and this action was implicated in drug ac tion to alleviate the pain, though direct proof on an analgesic effect has not been demon strated (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4A), while action potentials of longer latency contributing to the formation of the latter parts of the complex antidromic potentials did not appear until higher intensity of the stimulus was used (Fig. 4B, C Brookhart et al (1953). We are uncertain about the conduction velocity of the slowest afferent fibres, but from latencies of individual components of the antidromic potential, it seems likely to be less than half that obtained for the fastest fibres.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The trigeminal sensory system differs from spinal somatic afferents in several ways. Amongst these are the exceptionally high density of innervation of the face area (Darian-Smith, Mutton & Proctor, 1965), which is reflected in the large representation of the face in the sensory cortex (Darian-Smith, Ibister, Mok & Yokota, 1966); the unique sensory properties of the vibrissae (Zucker & Welcker, 1969;Pubols, Donovick & Pubols, 1973) and the dental pulp (Brookhart, Livingston & Haugen, 1953;Anderson, Hannam & Matthews, 1970); and the unique anatomical and physiological properties of the trigeminal sensory nuclei in the brainstem and spinal cord (Olzewski, 1950;Wall & Taub, 1962). In the preceding study, the general localization and overall pattern of CF projection from trigeminal cutaneous afferents and the SI cortex was described, using electrical stimulation of nerve trunks and laminar field potential analysis (Miles & Wiesendanger, 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%