2017
DOI: 10.1086/696291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Morphology of Eunicidan (Polychaeta) Jaws

Abstract: Polychaetes exhibit diverse feeding strategies and diets, with some species possessing hardened teeth or jaws of varying complexity. Species in the order Eunicida have complex, rigid, articulated jaws consisting of multiple pairs of maxillae and a pair of mandibles. While all Eunicida possess this general jaw structure, several characteristics of the jaws vary considerably among families. These differences, described for fossilized and extant species' jaws, have been used to infer evolutionary relationships. L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include mollusc radulae, polychaete jaws, mandibles of dragonflies and beetles, and marine arthropods, but all such studies are limited in scope. Some capture a small selection of shape variables taken to have functional significance (Clemo & Dorgan, 2017; Patterson, 1984), while the handful of recent applications of Finite Element Analyses to invertebrate feeding structures (Bicknell et al, 2018; Blanke et al, 2017; Hörnschemeyer et al, 2013; Krings et al, 2020) are focused on small numbers of taxa and individuals because of the computational demands and time‐consuming nature of robust FEA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include mollusc radulae, polychaete jaws, mandibles of dragonflies and beetles, and marine arthropods, but all such studies are limited in scope. Some capture a small selection of shape variables taken to have functional significance (Clemo & Dorgan, 2017; Patterson, 1984), while the handful of recent applications of Finite Element Analyses to invertebrate feeding structures (Bicknell et al, 2018; Blanke et al, 2017; Hörnschemeyer et al, 2013; Krings et al, 2020) are focused on small numbers of taxa and individuals because of the computational demands and time‐consuming nature of robust FEA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This descriptive approach has made it difficult to undertake robust statistical testing of hypotheses, leading to an overreliance on analogy and plausibility when attempting to assess the function of feeding structures in taxa that are extinct or hard to observe feeding. Despite many calls to address this issue across a range of disparate phyla (Bernays, 1991; Blanke et al, 2017; Clemo & Dorgan, 2017; Hickman, 1980; Krings et al, 2020; Padilla, 2004; Patterson, 1984), quantitative analysis has remained largely unexplored (Patterson, 1984; but see Blanke et al, 2017 as a notable exception). The few quantitative analyses of invertebrate feeding structures performed to date offer significant improvements over qualitative classifications of morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different jaw morphologies also have different biomechanics with implications for food capturing and shredding [33]. In maxillae bearing carriers of at least Lumbrineridae and Onuphidae ( Figure 3B,H), those plates attached to the carriers are primary maxillae (maxillae I, II in both families and unpaired III in Onuphidae) responsible for catching and shredding (exclusive of serrated plates) food items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unpaired serrated primary maxillae III in onuphid improves the breaking of food with different properties. The interlocking mechanism, present at the posterior end of maxillae I in both families, prevents slipping of the plates and it is an important mechanism in capturing moving food [33]. Feeding habits and food quality consumed are variable within recent and, probably, extinct Eunicida, including grazing, deposit-feeding, and predation, detritivory, herbivory, carnivory and omnivory [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Camargo and Lana 1995 , Clemo and Dorgan 2017 ): Prostomium with four eyes, three antennae and two lips palps (Fig. 3 e ).…”
Section: Checklistsmentioning
confidence: 99%