Further Results on UV Cleaning and Ni Electrobonding

Vig, J.R.; Lebus, J.W.; Filler, R.L.

doi:10.1109/freq.1975.200086

Cited by 18 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The sine function co(e) improves this relation. This fact can be noticed also from experimental results presented by Vig (1975).…”

Section: General Principle Of the Diffractometer Methods Of Refinementsupporting

confidence: 66%

“…Using the first equation of Vig's (1975) paper, one can express the ca angle (indicating the position of the specimen holder in its rotation around the main axis of the goniometer) for which the counter, fixed on an angle 20 = constant, records the maximum when the edge (O-O' in Fig. 1) of the atomic plane and plate face intersection is perpendicular to the axis of the goniometer as ca = arcsin (sin 0/cos ,3k).…”

Section: General Principle Of the Diffractometer Methods Of Refinementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The method described by Frydrychowicz & Switto (1979) amounts to this second scan mode. Vig (1975) has proposed the following procedure. The goniometer is adjusted so as to place the plate face near the angle 0 with respect to the incident beam.…”

Section: General Principle Of the Diffractometer Methods Of Refinementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For some special applications (for example the orientation of doubly rotated quartz plates), special equipment and measurement procedures were developed by Ciastre, Pegeot & Leroy (1978), Darces & Merigoux (1978), Sherman (1989), Weiss (1992) and others. Vig (1975) has noticed that the errors in previous systems have been due primarily to the fact that, whereas one wishes to measure the angle between the atomic plane and the plate face, goniometers in general measure the angle between the atomic plane and a plane defined by the goniometer, which is not necessarily parallel to the plate face. He has described several factors that can contribute to the errors in the goniometer measurements of circular-plate orientations (dust, pressure changes inside the vacuum chuck etc.).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It was confirmed there that a more serious area for consideration is the possible error that arises because of blank misalignment during measurement. This paper starts from two equations given by Vig (1975), who applied Bond and Armstrong's (Heising, 1946) analysis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A new method of highly accurate orientation of single crystals on a standard powder diffractometer

Michalski¹

1994

J Appl Cryst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A new method of obtaining high accuracy in a diffractometer refinement of a single-crystal orientation is presented in this paper. The primary errors in goniometer orientations are caused by the fact that, whereas the measurement required is the angle between the atomic plane and the plate face, goniometers in general measure the angle between the atomic plane and a plane defined by the goniometer, which is not necessarily parallel to the plate face. The methods of correcting Ibr these inaccuracies associated with the goniometer orientations that have been used and cited so far are based on the laser-assisted system described by Vig [Proc. 29th Annual Symposium on Frequency Control (1975), pp. 240-247]. The method described in this paper allows one to eliminate these errors by a specially invented method of measurements and calculations without a laser-assisted system or any other additional instruments.

show abstract

“…The sine function co(e) improves this relation. This fact can be noticed also from experimental results presented by Vig (1975).…”

Section: General Principle Of the Diffractometer Methods Of Refinementsupporting

confidence: 66%

Section: General Principle Of the Diffractometer Methods Of Refinementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: General Principle Of the Diffractometer Methods Of Refinementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A new method of highly accurate orientation of single crystals on a standard powder diffractometer

Michalski¹

1994

J Appl Cryst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

UV/Ozone Cleaning of Surfaces

Vig

Lebus²

1987

Treatise on Clean Surface Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

FORT MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY 07703-5302 NOTICES DisclaimersThe citation of trade names and names of manufacturers in this report is not to be construed as official Government indorsement or approval of commercial products or services referenced herein. Destruction NoticeDestroy this report when it is no longer needed. "itThe UV/ozone method, which is reviewed in this repo-Tt, is anefective method of removing a vat jety of contaminants from surfaces. It is a simlple-to-use dry process which is inexpensive to set up and operate. It can rapidly produce clean surfaces, in air 3r in a I vacuum systemn, at ambient temperatures. Placing properly precleaned surfaces wilhin a few millimeters of an ozonIe-producing UV Source can produce clean surfaces in less than one mlinute.

show abstract

Cheap non-toxic non-corrosive method of glass cleaning evaluated by contact angle, AFM, and SEM-EDX measurements

Dey

Naughton

2017

Environ Sci Pollut Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Glass surface cleaning is the very first step in advanced coating deposition and it also finds use in conserving museum objects. However, most of the wet chemical methods of glass cleaning use toxic and corrosive chemicals like concentrated sulfuric acid (HSO), piranha (a mixture of concentrated sulfuric acid and 30% hydrogen peroxide), and hydrogen fluoride (HF). On the other hand, most of the dry cleaning techniques like UV-ozone, plasma, and laser treatment require costly instruments. In this report, five eco-friendly wet chemical methods of glass cleaning were evaluated in terms of contact angle (measured by optical tensiometer), nano-scale surface roughness (measured by atomic force microscopy or AFM), and elemental composition (measured by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy or SEM-EDX). These glass cleaning methods are devoid of harsh chemicals and costly equipment, hence can be applied in situ in close proximity with plantation such as greenhouse or upon subtle objects such as museum artifacts. Out of these five methods, three methods are based on the chemical principle of chelation. It was found that the citric acid cleaning method gave the greatest change in contact angle within the hydrophilic regime (14.25° for new glass) indicating effective cleansing and the least surface roughness (0.178 nm for new glass) indicating no corrosive effect. One of the glass sample showed unique features which were traced backed to the history of the glass usage.

show abstract

Further Results on UV Cleaning and Ni Electrobonding

Cited by 18 publications

References 7 publications

A new method of highly accurate orientation of single crystals on a standard powder diffractometer

A new method of highly accurate orientation of single crystals on a standard powder diffractometer

UV/Ozone Cleaning of Surfaces

Cheap non-toxic non-corrosive method of glass cleaning evaluated by contact angle, AFM, and SEM-EDX measurements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About