2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion estimation using measured outputs with random parameter matrices subject to random delays and packet dropouts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The n x -dimensional signal process x k k≥1 has zero mean and its autocovariance function is expressed in a separable form, s,0 ) T . Furthermore, Hypothesis 1 covers even situations where the system matrix in the state-space model is singular, although a different factorization must be used in those cases (see e.g., [21]). Hence, Hypothesis 1 on the signal autocovariance function covers both stationary and non-stationary signals, providing a unified context to deal with a large number of different situations and avoiding the derivation of specific algorithms for each of them.…”
Section: Signal Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The n x -dimensional signal process x k k≥1 has zero mean and its autocovariance function is expressed in a separable form, s,0 ) T . Furthermore, Hypothesis 1 covers even situations where the system matrix in the state-space model is singular, although a different factorization must be used in those cases (see e.g., [21]). Hence, Hypothesis 1 on the signal autocovariance function covers both stationary and non-stationary signals, providing a unified context to deal with a large number of different situations and avoiding the derivation of specific algorithms for each of them.…”
Section: Signal Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when the sensors send their measurements to the processing center via a communication network some additional network-induced phenomena, such as random delays or measurement losses, inevitably arise during this transmission process, which can spoil the fusion estimators performance and motivate the design of fusion estimation algorithms for systems with one (or even several) of the aforementioned uncertainties (see e.g., [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], and references therein). All the above cited papers on signal estimation with random transmission delays assume independent random delays at each sensor and mutually independent delays between the different sensors; in [25] this restriction was weakened and random delays featuring correlation at consecutive sampling times were considered, thus allowing to deal with some common practical situations (e.g., those in which two consecutive observations cannot be delayed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great advantage of assumption (A1) is that it covers situations in which the signal evolution model is known, for both stationary and non-stationary signals (see, e.g., [23]). In addition, in uncertain systems with state-dependent multiplicative noise, as those considered in [6,32], the signal covariance function is factorizable, as it is shown in Section 5.…”
Section: Observation Model and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NCSs have received significant attention for their successful applications in space exploration, target tracking, remote surgery, unmanned aerial vehicles, industrial monitoring, and other areas in recent years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. As is well known, network-induced phenomena, such as communication delays, fading measurements or packet dropouts, quantization effects, and sensor saturations, are unavoidable in data transmission of practical networked systems due mainly to the sudden environment changes, intermittent transmission congestions, random failures, and repairs of components [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%