2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.77.016107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy communities and the concept of bridgeness in complex networks

Abstract: We consider the problem of fuzzy community detection in networks, which complements and expands the concept of overlapping community structure. Our approach allows each vertex of the graph to belong to multiple communities at the same time, determined by exact numerical membership degrees, even in the presence of uncertainty in the data being analyzed. We create an algorithm for determining the optimal membership degrees with respect to a given goal function. Based on the membership degrees, we introduce a mea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
263
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
263
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We visualize the links between the articles and show some highly cited titles. Each community is labeled with its dominant subject area; nodes are sized by their bridgeness (39), an inferred measure of their impact on multiple communities. This is taken from an analysis of the full 575,000 node network.…”
Section: The Model and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We visualize the links between the articles and show some highly cited titles. Each community is labeled with its dominant subject area; nodes are sized by their bridgeness (39), an inferred measure of their impact on multiple communities. This is taken from an analysis of the full 575,000 node network.…”
Section: The Model and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the rapid development of network clustering techniques, the ability of revealing overlaps between communities has become very important as well [86,9,39,83,31,89,57,71,52]. Indeed, communities in realworld graphs are often inherently overlapping: each person in a social web belongs usually to several groups (family, colleagues, friends, etc.…”
Section: Applications: Community Finding and Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…identify meaningful groups of customers (users), or support biomedical researchers in their search for individual target molecules and novel protein complex targets [47,4]. Since communities have no widely accepted unique definition, the number of available methods to pinpoint them is vast [74,76,26,46,32,54,73,64,27,67,71,72,37,36,38,52]. The majority of these algorithms classify the nodes into disjoint communities, and in most cases a global quantity called modularity [56,55] is used to evaluate the quality of the partitioning.…”
Section: Applications: Community Finding and Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, we introduce the evaluation metrics used in the paper, including the Nor-330 malized Mutual Information (NMI) [36], the error rate (CA) [37], the modularity [38], as well as the fuzzy modularity [39]. The NMI and error rate are used when the ground truth of the community structure of the temporal networks are available; otherwise, the modularity is used.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%