2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2020.3007314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galvanically Isolated DC-DC Converter Using a Single Isolation Transformer for Multi-Channel Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the higher switching frequencies allowed by wideband power devices, such as gallium nitride high-electron-mobility transistors (GaN HEMT) and silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFETs, will require a CMTI beyond 200 kV/µs [2,3]. Traditional chip-scale isolators are based on capacitors [4,5], transformers [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and LC hybrid networks [15], which exploit either thick silicon dioxide or polyimide layers as an isolation barrier. These approaches reveal inherent limitations in terms of both isolation rating and CMTI due to the maximum manufacturable dielectric thickness and related capacitive parasitics, respectively.…”
Section: Galvanic Isolators Based On Rf Planar Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the higher switching frequencies allowed by wideband power devices, such as gallium nitride high-electron-mobility transistors (GaN HEMT) and silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFETs, will require a CMTI beyond 200 kV/µs [2,3]. Traditional chip-scale isolators are based on capacitors [4,5], transformers [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and LC hybrid networks [15], which exploit either thick silicon dioxide or polyimide layers as an isolation barrier. These approaches reveal inherent limitations in terms of both isolation rating and CMTI due to the maximum manufacturable dielectric thickness and related capacitive parasitics, respectively.…”
Section: Galvanic Isolators Based On Rf Planar Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, very interesting solutions are based on common-source (CS) configurations that inherently provide high input impedance along with high gain, and lower power consumption, as in [23]. Typically, galvanically isolated interfaces require multi-channel capability, can be implemented by multiplexing different data channels on the same physic provided that a sufficiently high data rate is available [11,14]. However, several a tions also require bidirectional communication, such as in isolated gate drive half-duplex data transfer, a single physical isolated link can be used, while fullcommunication calls for an additional physical link [18] (see Figure 5).…”
Section: Chip-scale Isolation Vs Package-scale Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reinforced isolation is certified if a single isolation barrier passes the 10-kV surge test [4]. The combination of CMTI higher than 200 kV/µs and V SURGE better 10 kV reveals the severe limitations of traditional chip-scale isolators based on capacitors [5], [6], [7], transformers [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], and LC hybrid networks [16]. Indeed, chipscale galvanic isolators exploit either thick silicon dioxide or polyimide layers as isolation barrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional isolation devices, i.e., optocouplers and discrete transformers, have been widely replaced by highly integrated isolators exploiting electric and magnetic coupling [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. In the magnetic coupling approach, we can include not only the standard chip-scale isolators (i.e., by means of Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%