2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma versus alpha sensors for Rn-222 long-term monitoring in geological environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The count rate of both γ-sensors is similar, and the systematic difference among them can be attributed to a slight difference in sensitivity and/or owing to their slightly differing positions. The higher count rate of the γ-sensor, relative to the α-detector, reflects the large difference of the sampled volume (owing to the different range of α-and γ-radiation in air; see also [24]). The high correspondence of the radiation pattern recorded by the two γ-sensors allows referring to them as a single detector by summing the two count rates, thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The count rate of both γ-sensors is similar, and the systematic difference among them can be attributed to a slight difference in sensitivity and/or owing to their slightly differing positions. The higher count rate of the γ-sensor, relative to the α-detector, reflects the large difference of the sampled volume (owing to the different range of α-and γ-radiation in air; see also [24]). The high correspondence of the radiation pattern recorded by the two γ-sensors allows referring to them as a single detector by summing the two count rates, thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two 2 × 2 NaI detectors fitted with a single channel analyser in the range of 50-3000 keV (PM-11 detector; ROTEM Inc., Israel) are placed in parallel and horizontally at the monitoring site to record the γ-radiation emitted from the walls and from radon in the air of the room. The advantages of using these detectors for monitoring of radiation from radon are given by Zafrir et al [24]. Varying radon levels are recorded by the count rate of the γ -detectors, connected to a datalogger.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous monitoring of atmospheric radon would be also extremely valuable, since significant disequilibrium between Rn-222 and its progeny is expected to occur on all time scales, including sub-synoptic time scales (Zahorowski et al 2012). Further insight is expected to be gained by extending the monitoring set-up to include additional alpha particle sensors, given the advantages of the combination of the two types of measurements (Zafrir et al 2011(Zafrir et al , 2013 for the understanding of the temporal variability of radon and its progeny. Figure 1: Geographical location of the ARM-ENA facility at the Graciosa island, Azores archipelago.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous radon monitoring, particularly in the case of very low concentrations such as typically found in the atmosphere, is much more challenging than the continuous monitoring of radon progeny, fostering the measurement of the gamma radiation from the radioactive decay of radon progeny as an alternative to the direct measurement of radon. Crystal scintillators for gamma rays have higher relative sensitivity in comparison to solid-state alpha detectors and ionization chambers, allowing for a more detailed characterization of the temporal variability of environmental radioactivity, particularly in the case of fast changes (Zafrir et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radon sensitivity of the Barasol alpha system—Barasol, BT45N, of Algade Inc., France, based on the manufacturer's specifications, is about 50 Bq/m3 per 1 count in 1 h, and the equivalent radon sensitivity of the narrow gamma system in use—1.5 inches × 3 inches BGO crystal scintillators of Scionix, Netherlands, is about 0.02 Bq/m3 per 1 count per 1 h. based on the comparison under equilibrium conditions, with a calibrated alpha ionization chamber device—AlphaGUARD, Saphymo GmbH, Germany [ Zafrir et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%