2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2012472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaps analysis for CD metrology beyond the 22nm node

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurement sensitivity of less than 0.1 nm was revealed for sub-25 nm wide lines (critical dimensions (CDs)) again using 546 nm wavelength [8]. TSOM is being increasingly recognized as a viable nanometrology method, as evidenced by being listed in several technology roadmaps and guides [19–21], patent applications [22,23], and science news reports [24,25]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement sensitivity of less than 0.1 nm was revealed for sub-25 nm wide lines (critical dimensions (CDs)) again using 546 nm wavelength [8]. TSOM is being increasingly recognized as a viable nanometrology method, as evidenced by being listed in several technology roadmaps and guides [19–21], patent applications [22,23], and science news reports [24,25]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, variations in these parameters were studied for the parameter ranges shown in Table 1. Following industry requirements, trenches in Si and trenches and holes in oxide were studied [3]. The results for the 11 nm and 32 nm DR trench and hole structures are shown in Figs.…”
Section: Tsom For Har Metrology: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensional metrology of high aspect ratio (HAR) features [111] will become more challenging as technology progresses, particularly in memory applications where designs are evolving from planar to vertical architectures with multi-level gates assembled in 3-D structures [3, 1120]. The basic building blocks of these features are deep trenches and holes in oxide, silicon, or multiple alternating layers of oxide and silicon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 The standard method for photomask structure characterization is scanning electron microscopy (SEM). 2 This method is very powerful; however, the high cost of ownership and the low throughput are challenging factors. Furthermore, the accuracy of this method is limited by interactions between the electron beam and the photomask structures, which especially affects structures on insulating glass substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%