2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9cc03159f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gas-driven exfoliation for producing high-quality graphene

Abstract: A novel simple gas-driven exfoliation method with mild operating conditions is explored for producing high-quality graphene.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the final step of sonication, 2% production of SLGFs can be obtained in one run, compared with the previous method that produced ∼1 wt % of monolayer graphene. 10 Although to some extent, this new method is not superior to a few monolayer production methods such as by energy-intensive gas-driven exfoliation (62%) 14 or solution-state exfoliation by MI (∼93%), 23 the obtained SLGFs herein are defect-free by a simple, energy-efficient, and green method that is much better than those prepared by the extremely strong exfoliation. On the other hand, a strong sonication of the as-received natural graphite or P-graphite without microwave exfoliation only produces a few layer graphene flakes with a low concentration of 5.1 ± 0.86 and 3.8 ± 0.4 μg/mL, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…After the final step of sonication, 2% production of SLGFs can be obtained in one run, compared with the previous method that produced ∼1 wt % of monolayer graphene. 10 Although to some extent, this new method is not superior to a few monolayer production methods such as by energy-intensive gas-driven exfoliation (62%) 14 or solution-state exfoliation by MI (∼93%), 23 the obtained SLGFs herein are defect-free by a simple, energy-efficient, and green method that is much better than those prepared by the extremely strong exfoliation. On the other hand, a strong sonication of the as-received natural graphite or P-graphite without microwave exfoliation only produces a few layer graphene flakes with a low concentration of 5.1 ± 0.86 and 3.8 ± 0.4 μg/mL, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, the low efficiency of adhesive peeling results in low yield [1,17], which only meets the needs of laboratory research. In recent years, supercritical fluid (SCF) exfoliation [58], wet-jet milling exfoliation [59], and gas-driven exfoliation [60] have been developed, which are more efficient. Wang et al [58] produced graphene at high-efficiency by supercritical CO 2 exfoliation with rapid expansion.…”
Section: Preparation Methods Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [58] produced graphene at high-efficiency by supercritical CO2 exfoliation with rapid expansion. Zhang et al [60] used a high sheer rate of up to 3.3 × 10 7 s −1 generated by driving high-speed gas at working pressures as low as 0.5 MPa to exfoliate graphite; the microscopic morphology and size changes of the stripped graphene are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3 shows that 62% of the obtained graphene sheets are single-layer, while 97% of flakes are ≤2 layers, with no lattice defect and high quality.…”
Section: Preparation Methods Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extreme shear rate of up to 3.3 Â 10 7 s À1 was inferred at working pressures as low as 0.5 MPa. [97] Nevertheless, the calculated yield is still low, about 1.5%. The low yield is likely due to the fact that the extreme shear rates were found to be concentrated at the edges of the tube at the outlet.…”
Section: Shear Stress Exfoliationmentioning
confidence: 96%