1993
DOI: 10.1080/0950069930150109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and racial differences in unstructured learning groups in science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11. Many other researchers have used video technology and subsequently analysed transcripts of the tapes (Conwell et al 1994, Issroff et al 1994). 12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…11. Many other researchers have used video technology and subsequently analysed transcripts of the tapes (Conwell et al 1994, Issroff et al 1994). 12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The naturalistic interactions which arose through task engagement were recorded using a video camera with a desktop microphone. As have many researchers before who utilized video technology, the transcripts were subsequently scrutinized (Conwell et al, 1994;Issroff et al, 1994). In analysing the transcripts, actions, reactions, implicit understandings, dialogic exchange, procedural and conceptual development and task outcomes (indicating the complex nature of learning) have all been considered.…”
Section: Observing Pupils-in-actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant also to this study is evidence suggesting that gender effects can take place in untrained groups undertaking practical/material manipulation activities. To maximise interaction between group members and the material solution, thirteen single sex groups averaging four pupils were formed in order to: (1) minimise the marginalisation of girls with boys' tendency to monopolise materials and apparatus in groups (Conwell et al, 1993;Whyte, 1984);…”
Section: Participants Selection and Groupingmentioning
confidence: 99%