2008
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2009.167.172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Creative Perceptions of Undergraduate Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
16
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…International Journal of Instruction, April 2021 • Vol.14, No.2 results of this research are in line with research conducted by Naderi et al (2009) who found that there were no differences in perceptions of creativity between male and female students. Unlike the case with research conducted by Baran, Erdogan, & Cakmak (2011) which found a relationship of creativity with student gender.…”
Section: The Statistical Creative Framework In Descriptive Statistics …supporting
confidence: 90%
“…International Journal of Instruction, April 2021 • Vol.14, No.2 results of this research are in line with research conducted by Naderi et al (2009) who found that there were no differences in perceptions of creativity between male and female students. Unlike the case with research conducted by Baran, Erdogan, & Cakmak (2011) which found a relationship of creativity with student gender.…”
Section: The Statistical Creative Framework In Descriptive Statistics …supporting
confidence: 90%
“…A total of 18 studies 2 did not meet this first selection criterion and were eliminated from the analysis. Next, we only included studies if they used more objective measures of creativity (e.g., TTCT) or self-report scales that demonstrated adequate reliability, such as measures of creative personality (e.g., Naderi et al, 2009) or creative self-confidence beliefs (e.g., Skager et al, 1967). This resulted in the elimination of four studies.…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconsistent findings were found in past studies on gender differences toward creativity where previous researchers used different instruments and found that male and female has no difference in creative perception (Naderi et al, 2009) and creative potential (Ariffin et al, 2011) but has different in creative thinking ability (Chua, 2013). Through technology advancement which using virtual learning method (Gunawan et al, 2018), female poses more on virtual creativity, while male is higher in figural creativity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 89%