2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2010.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene expression and deletion analysis of mechanisms for electron transfer from electrodes to Geobacter sulfurreducens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
128
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(123 reference statements)
1
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). PccH is also required for G. sulfurreducens to accept electrons from a poised cathode in a microbial fuel cell (Strycharz et al, 2011). Further investigation into the role of PccH in insoluble Fe(III) oxide reduction is necessary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). PccH is also required for G. sulfurreducens to accept electrons from a poised cathode in a microbial fuel cell (Strycharz et al, 2011). Further investigation into the role of PccH in insoluble Fe(III) oxide reduction is necessary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cathodes hold great potential as a stable electron source to drive microbial metabolism (7); however, little is known about the underlying extracellular electron transfer (EET) pathways that could be exploited for biocathode functional engineering. Although biocathode EET has been demonstrated for a variety of microorganisms, including acetogens (5) and a methanogenic archaeon (6), studies aimed at identifying EET conduits from the electrode to cells have mostly been confined to the model organisms Geobacter (8) and Shewanella (9), due to the massive effort put forth to understand how these iron-reducing bacteria are able to catalyze EET at bioanodes (10)(11)(12). The ability of iron-reducing bacteria to reduce anodes led to the hypothesis that iron-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB) would be able to perform EET with cathodes, which has been demonstrated for at least two FeOB, Mariprofundus ferrooxydans and Rhodopseudomonas palustris (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly the Mtr system is reversible and capable of accepting electrons from the electrode surface where the systems in Geobacter are not. OmcS and OmcZ do not affect electrode oxidation whereas GSU3274, a heme containing cytochrome does 27 . Furthermore, direct electron transfer differs when the extracellular electron acceptor is soluble.…”
Section: (2) Direct Eetmentioning
confidence: 99%