2007
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01118.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General-Purpose Filter Design for Neural Prosthetic Devices

Abstract: . Braindriven interfaces depend on estimation procedures to convert neural signals to inputs for prosthetic devices that can assist individuals with severe motor deficits. Previous estimation procedures were developed on an application-specific basis. Here we report a coherent estimation framework that unifies these procedures and motivates new applications of prosthetic devices driven by action potentials, local field potentials (LFPs), electrocorticography (ECoG), electroencephalography (EEG), electromyograp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hope to systematically investigate tuning function stability and the effects of learning with more controlled tasks and larger data sets in future studies. Second, it should also be noted that nonstationarity of tuning properties, as well as changes in the recorded neuronal population, can be properly handled in neuroprosthetic applications via intermittent recalibration of decoding filters (e.g., as performed here with filter rebuilding at the beginning of a session) or via continuous tracking of the neuronal population and their tuning properties (Eden et al, 2004a,b;Srinivasan et al, 2007). In addition, as pointed out by Rokni et al (2007), one can also conjecture that an optimal solution manifold might similarly emerge for the neuronal population recorded at the prosthetic interface.…”
Section: Stability Of Recorded Neuronal Signals: Changes In Recorded mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hope to systematically investigate tuning function stability and the effects of learning with more controlled tasks and larger data sets in future studies. Second, it should also be noted that nonstationarity of tuning properties, as well as changes in the recorded neuronal population, can be properly handled in neuroprosthetic applications via intermittent recalibration of decoding filters (e.g., as performed here with filter rebuilding at the beginning of a session) or via continuous tracking of the neuronal population and their tuning properties (Eden et al, 2004a,b;Srinivasan et al, 2007). In addition, as pointed out by Rokni et al (2007), one can also conjecture that an optimal solution manifold might similarly emerge for the neuronal population recorded at the prosthetic interface.…”
Section: Stability Of Recorded Neuronal Signals: Changes In Recorded mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been extensive work in modeling spike trains [5], [38]- [42] and estimating firing rates [43]- [47]. While some decode algorithms average over neural activity in small temporal windows [17], some algorithms use firing rates or use spiking models directly [18]. Spiking models are another source of approximation in BMIs.…”
Section: B Models For Neural Spikingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to this shortcoming, models such as the Kalman filter [31], which stipulate a model for physical behavior in arm reaches, have been shown to outperform the linear decoder in a variety of cases [14], [48]. This success led to extensions that assume similar models for physical behavior [5], [13], [17], [18], [21]- [23], [50]. Unfortunately, this class of models for physical behavior is inappropriate in some ways for reaching movements.…”
Section: ) Models For Physical Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques have been used for basic neuroscience research (Kass et al, 2011;Okatan et al, 2005;Eldawlatly et al, 2009;Berger et al, 2011;Jenison et al, 2011;So et al, 2012), to improve biophysical neural models (Ahrens et al, 2008;Meng et al, 2011;Mensi et al, 2012), or to design better BMIs (Shoham et al, 2005;Srinivasan et al, , 2007Truccolo et al, 2008;Wang and Principe, 2010;Saleh et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to help to design algorithms for inferring behaviour/stimulus from previously unseen neural data, a processed referred to as decoding and commonly used in the design of brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) (Shoham et al, 2005;Srinivasan et al, 2007;Sanchez et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%