2002
DOI: 10.1080/00224540209603898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Versus Specific Victim Blaming

Abstract: The authors investigated (a) whether victim blaming is a general variable in a person's make-up or (b) whether the extent of blaming depends on the kind of victim considered. The authors evaluated scales for blaming (a) victims in general, (b) society in general, (c) a specific kind of victim (i.e., AIDS), and (d) the society in which AIDS victims live. The general and specific scales had favorable psychometric properties, including reliability. General and specific victim blaming were significantly and positi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several modified scales have been found to have good internal consistency based on split-half reliability and coefficient alpha (Adewuya and Makanjuola 2005;Gureje et al 2005;Johnson et al 2002). Furthermore, the predictive validity of the social distance scale has been supported (Bethlehem 1977).…”
Section: Social Distance Scalementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several modified scales have been found to have good internal consistency based on split-half reliability and coefficient alpha (Adewuya and Makanjuola 2005;Gureje et al 2005;Johnson et al 2002). Furthermore, the predictive validity of the social distance scale has been supported (Bethlehem 1977).…”
Section: Social Distance Scalementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Attribution theory is a helpful framework to unpack how stigmatization may take place (Weiner, 1995). It posits that discriminatory behavior is determined by a cognitive-emotional process (Corrigan, Markowitz, Watson, Rowan, & Kubiak, 2003; Johnson, Mullick, & Mulford, 2002). Individuals make attributions about the cause and controllability of a particular characteristic (e.g., being gay) or illness (e.g., AIDS) aversion, anger) that influence behavioral reactions (e.g., rejection).…”
Section: Stigma and Attribution Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature on victim-blaming attitudes has addressed issues of sexual violence (Haywood & Swank, 2008), domestic violence (Bryant & Spencer, 2003;Pierce & Harris, 1993;Riggs & O'Leary, 1996), and persons with terminal illnesses (Johnson, Mullick, & Mulford, 2002). Although these studies have addressed adult perceptions of victim blaming, including college student attitudes, the literature on victim blaming and bullying has primarily focused on the attitudes of school-age populations (Baldry, 2004;Boulton et al, 1999;Brown et al, 2011;Gini, 2008;Hara, 2002;Hymel et al, 2005;Menesini et al, 1997;Rigby, 2005;Rigby & Slee, 1991;Thornberg & Knutsen, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%