2021
DOI: 10.4230/lipics.concur.2021.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalising Projection in Asynchronous Multiparty Session Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the proposed syntax for global and local types is completely free, two well-formedness conditions are imposed on types, which are meant to prevent dangerous races. Sessions are synchronous in [10,14] and asynchronous in [17], which is the work that is closest to ours. In that paper, input races are allowed under sophisticated conditions on projections of global types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While the proposed syntax for global and local types is completely free, two well-formedness conditions are imposed on types, which are meant to prevent dangerous races. Sessions are synchronous in [10,14] and asynchronous in [17], which is the work that is closest to ours. In that paper, input races are allowed under sophisticated conditions on projections of global types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The session of Example 1.2 cannot be typed in [14,10,17] because the syntax of global types does not allow two participants to exchange messages by first performing both outputs and then both inputs. If we omit the initial exchange of messages between Alice and Bob, the resulting session can be typed in [10,17] but not in [14].…”
Section: Example 12 (Fake Input Race In Asynchronous Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations