2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation–Collection Electrochemistry Inside a Rotating Droplet

Abstract: In this work, we explore generation-collection electrochemistry in a rotating droplet hydrodynamic system, where a 70 μL droplet containing a redox active species (ferrocyanide) is sandwiched between an upper rotating rod and bottom nonmoving generator and collector planar electrodes. In such a system, we studied the effect of the counter electrode reaction on the recorded generator current, and the effect of the generator-collector distance (ranging from 3 to ca. 500 μm) on the collection efficiencies obtaine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where i l-back is the limiting current of the back electrode; D′ is the diffusion coefficient of the product collected at the back electrode and generated at the front one; γ 0 is a parameter correlated with a given method and dual electrode system geometry, 19 while all other symbols have been defined above; k l-back is the slope of the i l-back versus ω 1/2 Levich plot (Figure S2). The collection efficiency coefficient N RABDE can then be evaluated from the values of each current at each rotation rate through Eqn (S1).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where i l-back is the limiting current of the back electrode; D′ is the diffusion coefficient of the product collected at the back electrode and generated at the front one; γ 0 is a parameter correlated with a given method and dual electrode system geometry, 19 while all other symbols have been defined above; k l-back is the slope of the i l-back versus ω 1/2 Levich plot (Figure S2). The collection efficiency coefficient N RABDE can then be evaluated from the values of each current at each rotation rate through Eqn (S1).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most of the data used in the following were obtained in a range of scan rates where i conv has a negligible effect, for the sake of simplicity we use the classical Levich formulation in eq . Note that i l‑back is not significantly affected because the mass transfer that potential curve for the reoxidation of Fe­(CN) 6 4– at the back couples the generator and collector electrodes depends exclusively on the value of the tangential flow, that is, only on the value of ω 1/2 : where i l‑back is the limiting current of the back electrode; D ′ is the diffusion coefficient of the product collected at the back electrode and generated at the front one; γ 0 is a parameter correlated with a given method and dual electrode system geometry, while all other symbols have been defined above; k l‑back is the slope of the i l‑back versus ω 1/2 Levich plot (Figure S2). The collection efficiency coefficient N RABDE can then be evaluated from the values of each current at each rotation rate through Eqn (S1).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Electrodes with CNPs modified with phenylsulfonate groups are known to have desirable properties such as porosity, which ensures a large surface area. 29 Moreover, the CNPs used in this research have been previously shown to be good for the detection of neurotransmitters in the presence of common interfering agents. 18 One explanation can be that the CNPs are negatively charged, as are the common interfering agents AA and UA at physiological pH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the present study, we suggest the use of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) encapsulated in a silica matrix . Electrodes with CNPs modified with phenylsulfonate groups are known to have desirable properties such as porosity, which ensures a large surface area . Moreover, the CNPs used in this research have been previously shown to be good for the detection of neurotransmitters in the presence of common interfering agents .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting example is the pattern formation on ITO films coated on borosilicate glass by scanning a linearly polarized nanosecond pulsed laser beam, making use of a self-organization phenomenon named laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS) [18]. Apart from these examples, there are other reports on laser patterning of ITO using other lasers, such as an UV-excimer laser and femtosecond-pulsed laser [19], but none of these gives the advantage of being widely available and preferably affordable means of fabrication of microelectrodes. Currently, CO2 lasers, emitting infrared radiation at a wavelength of 10.6 µm, are the highest power continuous wave lasers available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%