1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2580736.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genes of succinyl‐CoA ligase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: Succinyl-CoA ligase (succinyl-CoA synthetase) catalyzes the nucleotide-dependent conversion of succinyl-CoA to succinate. This enzyme functions in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and is also involved in ketone-body breakdown in animals. The enzyme is composed of A and β subunits that are required for catalytic activity. Two genes, LSC1 (YOR142W) and LSC2 (YGR244C), with high similarity to succinylCoA ligase subunits from other species were isolated from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The expression of these gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the mutant strains lacking any of the enzymes involved in both the TCA and glyoxylate cycles (∆aco1 and ∆fum1 ) or solely in the glyoxylate cycle (∆icl1, ∆mls1 and ∆mdh2 strains) also showed growth impairment on YPA as well as on YNBA. However, in accordance with a previous report (Przybyla-Zawislak et al, 1998), the ∆lsc1 strain did not show any growth defect on YPA. Together, these results indicate that most of the TCA and glyoxylate cycle enzymes are indispensable for the growth of yeast cells on YPA.…”
Section: Succinate-fumarate Carrier (Sfc1) Is Essential For Acetate Usupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the mutant strains lacking any of the enzymes involved in both the TCA and glyoxylate cycles (∆aco1 and ∆fum1 ) or solely in the glyoxylate cycle (∆icl1, ∆mls1 and ∆mdh2 strains) also showed growth impairment on YPA as well as on YNBA. However, in accordance with a previous report (Przybyla-Zawislak et al, 1998), the ∆lsc1 strain did not show any growth defect on YPA. Together, these results indicate that most of the TCA and glyoxylate cycle enzymes are indispensable for the growth of yeast cells on YPA.…”
Section: Succinate-fumarate Carrier (Sfc1) Is Essential For Acetate Usupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, on YNBA, growth was classified into two phenotypic categories; the members of the first group ( cit1, ∆idh1, ∆kgd1, ∆lsc1 and ∆mdh1 ) grew on acetate as the sole carbon source, while those of the second group (∆aco1, ∆fum1, ∆sdh1, ∆mls1, ∆icl1 and ∆mdh2 ) failed to grow on this carbon source. These results suggest that most of the TCA cycle-specific mitochondrial enzymes, such as Cit1, NAD + -dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase (an octamer composed of four Idh1 and four Idh2 subunits; McAlister-Henn, 1991, 1992), KGDC (a heterotrimer of Kgd1p, Kgd2p and Lpd1p) and succinyl-CoA ligase (LSC; a heterodimer of Lsc1 and Lsc2; Przybyla-Zawislak et al, 1998), are dispensable for acetate utilization on YNBA plates. It thus appears that the succinate dehydrogenase complex (SDHC), a tetramer of Sdh1, Sdh2, Sdh3 and Sdh4 (Lombardo et al, 1990;Chapman et al, 1992;Bullis and Lemire, 1994;Daignan-Fornier et al, 1994), is the only TCA cycle-specific enzyme required for acetate utilization on YNBA.…”
Section: Succinate-fumarate Carrier (Sfc1) Is Essential For Acetate Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth phenotypes and protein expression in idhΔcit1 Δ and aco1 Δcit1 Δ mutants Yeast mutants lacking IDH or ACO1 have been reported to share some growth phenotypes, including an inability to grow with acetate as a carbon source [14] and a propensity for generation of petite segregants [10]. To better understand the phenotypes exhibited by IDH mutants and their suppression by CIT1 defects, we wished to first compare the properties of idhΔ and idhΔ cit1 Δ mutant strains with those of aco1 Δ and aco1 Δcit1 Δ mutant strains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better understand the phenotypes exhibited by IDH mutants and their suppression by CIT1 defects, we wished to first compare the properties of idhΔ and idhΔ cit1 Δ mutant strains with those of aco1 Δ and aco1 Δcit1 Δ mutant strains. In initial experiments with previously constructed aco1 Δ gene disruption strains [10,14], we could not retrieve any respiratory-competent colonies capable of growth with non-fermentable carbon sources, i.e. these strains had become entirely petite during storage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation