2017
DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2017.1310165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of important antioxidant compounds in cabbage (Brassiaca oleraceavar.capitataL.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RRMA, RJA, PMA, RCA, 208A and 5A with higher concentration of different nutritional compounds can be utilized in future breeding programs for quality F 1 hybrid development in cabbage. The significance of heterosis breeding for quality hybrid development has also been reported earlier in cabbage (Singh et al, 2010;Parkash et al, 2017), cauliflower (Dey et al, 2014;Ram et al, 2018) and Chinese cabbage (Xie et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…RRMA, RJA, PMA, RCA, 208A and 5A with higher concentration of different nutritional compounds can be utilized in future breeding programs for quality F 1 hybrid development in cabbage. The significance of heterosis breeding for quality hybrid development has also been reported earlier in cabbage (Singh et al, 2010;Parkash et al, 2017), cauliflower (Dey et al, 2014;Ram et al, 2018) and Chinese cabbage (Xie et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Spontaneous fermentations occur due to the action of natural epiphytic biota, mainly lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Plant biotype, region, climatic conditions, and growing conditions (Parkash et al, 2017;Tanyi et al, 2018) infIuence the quality of the biota, which makes it difficult to control the fermentation process and maintain the uniformity of the final product (Capozzi et al, 2017). In recent years, to avoid this drawback, the use of starters as a way to control the bioprocess has been proposed by several researchers (Johanningsmeier et al, 2007;Lillo-Pérez et al, 2021;Montemurro et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%