1960
DOI: 10.5642/aliso.19600403.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and Taxonomic Studies in Gilia. XI. Fertility Relationships of the Diploid Cobwebby Gilias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection apParently favors the pollen size with just enough metabolites for pollen tube growth to the embryo sac. This view is supported by the fac t that congeners with different style length s may not be successful when the short style and small pollen pare nt serves as the pollen source (e.g., Polemonium , Ostenfeld, 1929; Cilia, Grant and Grant, 1960;Phlox, Levin, 1966). The rela tion ship between pollen size and s tyle length is distorted by polyploidy, which increases pollen size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Selection apParently favors the pollen size with just enough metabolites for pollen tube growth to the embryo sac. This view is supported by the fac t that congeners with different style length s may not be successful when the short style and small pollen pare nt serves as the pollen source (e.g., Polemonium , Ostenfeld, 1929; Cilia, Grant and Grant, 1960;Phlox, Levin, 1966). The rela tion ship between pollen size and s tyle length is distorted by polyploidy, which increases pollen size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…What is needed for this extension is the modem recognition that species, especially those of sessile organisms such as plants, are far from homogeneous genetic entities. Thus, partial or complete reproductive isolation is not ruled out among subspecies, varieties, or distinct populations within plant species, and indeed is found commonly in the form of sterility of crosses and/or reduced viability or fertility of F I or F 2 "hybrids" (see Miiller 1883;Kruckeberg 1957;Grant and Grant 1960;Martin 1963;Grant 1971;Vickery 1978;Banyard and James 1979). Furthermore, there is no a priori logical reason to reject the possibility of outbreeding depression on even finer scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, however, a postzygotic barrier on a moderate spatial scale may be reinforced by differential fertilization success of pollen (Paterniani 1969;Crosby 1970;Waser 1993a and references therein;Waser and Price 1993). In all these features outbreeding depression over moderate distances resembles, and indeed may precede, the partial or complete reproductive isolation that characterizes crosses between many (although not all) entities defined as distinct angiosperm species (Grant and Grant 1960;Martin 1963;Vickery 1978;Levin 1979;Levy 1991;Waser 1998). Unfortunately, we know relatively little about the expression of outbreeding depression in angiosperms or how this expression changes with increasing spatial, genetic, and taxonomic distance, ultimately to the level of species and genus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%