2018
DOI: 10.56093/ijans.v88i2.79336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic characterization of three fertility genes in Egyptian sheep and goat breeds

Abstract: One of the effective approaches for genetic improvement of productivity traits in farm animals is markerassisted selection (MAS) depending on the genetic markers that are associated with superior productivity traits. The improvement of fertility trait is one of the main targets in small ruminant breeding programs. This work aimed to identify RFLPs and SNPs variations among three fertility genes in Egyptian sheep and goat breeds. RFLP analysis of the amplified fragments at 462-bp from exon 1 of GDF9 using HpaII… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where the results of our study coincided with the results of what was presented by the results of Othman et al [42] appeared in this study on Egyptian goats and sheep, where the animals had fertilization and a high number of births and a high fertility rate, as most of them had a genotype of GG 85.4%, the most influential in terms of fertility in these study, while the genotype GA was less effective 14.6%. indicated Kasiriyan et al [43] that sheep animals with genotype GG have high fertility and a higher number of births than animals with genotype GA, while animals with genotype AA have low fertility. It is due to a reason, as indicated by Dnce et al [44], due to genetic factors, as well as that the increase in female body weight, which is due to the genetic influence at the time of fertilization, leads to an increase in fertility in goats, and that the correlation factor between the fertility rate and body weight at fertilization is highly significant (P< 0.01) up to a fertility of 0.88%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where the results of our study coincided with the results of what was presented by the results of Othman et al [42] appeared in this study on Egyptian goats and sheep, where the animals had fertilization and a high number of births and a high fertility rate, as most of them had a genotype of GG 85.4%, the most influential in terms of fertility in these study, while the genotype GA was less effective 14.6%. indicated Kasiriyan et al [43] that sheep animals with genotype GG have high fertility and a higher number of births than animals with genotype GA, while animals with genotype AA have low fertility. It is due to a reason, as indicated by Dnce et al [44], due to genetic factors, as well as that the increase in female body weight, which is due to the genetic influence at the time of fertilization, leads to an increase in fertility in goats, and that the correlation factor between the fertility rate and body weight at fertilization is highly significant (P< 0.01) up to a fertility of 0.88%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, we have detected seven SNPs in the KISS1R/GPR54 gene located on ovine chromosomes 5 among the four studied Iranian breeds (Table 2). This gene displays numerous polymorphisms in livestock that have been associated with reproductive traits in cattle (Chen et al, 2011), goat (Feng et al, 2009;Cao et al, 2011;Ahlawat et al, 2015;Othman et al, 2018), sheep (Chu et al, 2012;Tang et al, 2012;Othman et al, 2018), and pig (Li et al, 2008). In ovine, Tang et al (2012) detected two mutations in the GPR54 gene in Small Tail Han and Corriedale sheep.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With MAS, breeders can now select individuals based on their genetic profile, enabling more accurate and efficient breeding programs. Markers associated with desired traits inform decisions about which individuals to breed, moving beyond reliance solely on physical appearance [14].…”
Section: History Of Mas In Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%