2002
DOI: 10.1139/g02-012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity ofCarica papayaas revealed by AFLP markers

Abstract: Genetic relationships among Carica papaya cultivars, breeding lines, unimproved germplasm, and related species were established using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Seventy-one papaya accessions and related species were analyzed with nine EcoRI-MseI primer combinations. A total of 186 informative AFLP markers was generated and analyzed. Cluster analysis suggested limited genetic variation in papaya, with an average genetic similarity among 63 papaya accessions of 0.880. Genetic diversit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
73
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Storey (1941), the papaya can be selfpollinating without losing vigor. Kim et al (2002) and Manshardt (2002) agreed that the predominant reproductive system in papaya is self-pollination. These results corroborate our results, that is, the papaya can be classified as a facultative self-pollinating species.…”
Section: Pollen:ovule Ratio (P:o)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Storey (1941), the papaya can be selfpollinating without losing vigor. Kim et al (2002) and Manshardt (2002) agreed that the predominant reproductive system in papaya is self-pollination. These results corroborate our results, that is, the papaya can be classified as a facultative self-pollinating species.…”
Section: Pollen:ovule Ratio (P:o)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threefold reduction of accumulated genetic distance is attributed mainly to the high resolution of codominant SSR markers that separate the three classes of genotypes in the F 2 population, which contrasts with the dominant AFLP markers that mix the homozygous-dominant and heterozygous classes to calculate inflated map distances. The AFLP map was constructed from an F 2 population of closely related parents, Kapoho and SunUp, which would assure a high recombination rate and thus increase genetic distance (Kim et al 2002;Ma et al 2004). The parents of the F 2 population used for our SSR map are more distantly related (Kim et al 2002) and expected to have a lower recombination rate.…”
Section: Suppression Of Recombination In the Msymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AFLP map was constructed from an F 2 population of closely related parents, Kapoho and SunUp, which would assure a high recombination rate and thus increase genetic distance (Kim et al 2002;Ma et al 2004). The parents of the F 2 population used for our SSR map are more distantly related (Kim et al 2002) and expected to have a lower recombination rate. Another major reason for the inflated genetic distance is missing data as can be seen by the 1-cM genetic distance caused by two missing data points in the genotype of otherwise perfectly sexcosegregating marker P3K2981YC0 on LG 1.…”
Section: Suppression Of Recombination In the Msymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the germplasm of papaya has considerable genetic variability for several important agronomic traits, such as fruit size and shape, skin color, flavor and sweetness, duration of juvenile period, and plant height (Kim et al, 2002;Dias et al, 2011). Exploitation of this genetic variability may strengthen the genetic basis of this crop through the development of new lines and hybrids, given that the reproductive system of papaya enables crosses and that the absence of inbreeding depression makes it possible to obtain lines with high vigor (Oliveira et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, when used alone, they show some restrictions for diversity studies. In contrast, DNA molecular markers can reveal differences between genotypes more efficiently because the markers characterize the genome of the organism directly, where they are not influenced by the environment (Lefebvre et al, 2001;Kim et al, 2002). However, as disadvantages DNA markers access the entire genome instead of only the regions responsible for the manifestation of the traits of interest (Franco et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%