1993
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.118.1.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity of Red Raspberry Varieties throughout the-World

Abstract: Pedigrees of 137 red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) varieties released throughout the world since 1960 were used to calculate: 1) the genetic contribution of founding clones to these varieties; 2) genetic relatedness among them; and 3) their inbreeding coefficients. Fifty founding clones contributed to the pedigrees of these varieties with a mean genetic contribution ranging from <0.1% to 21%. Varieties were clustered according to the genetic contribution into groups strongly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
26
1
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(18 reference statements)
6
26
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the calculation of relatively low inbreeding coefficients for both ‘Heritage’ and ‘Tulameen’ (0.094 and 0.069 respectively) by Dale et al (1993) [49], in this investigation we observed almost twice the level of heterozygous SNPs in the genome of ’Heritage’ than in the genome of ‘Tulameen’. Relatively high levels of genome differentiation and heterozygosity is a feature of red raspberry germplasm, despite the majority of modern varieties being derived from a narrow genetic base [49].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Despite the calculation of relatively low inbreeding coefficients for both ‘Heritage’ and ‘Tulameen’ (0.094 and 0.069 respectively) by Dale et al (1993) [49], in this investigation we observed almost twice the level of heterozygous SNPs in the genome of ’Heritage’ than in the genome of ‘Tulameen’. Relatively high levels of genome differentiation and heterozygosity is a feature of red raspberry germplasm, despite the majority of modern varieties being derived from a narrow genetic base [49].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Using methods described by Falconer and Mackay (1996), we calculated the inbreeding coefficient for S1 to be 0.35, indicating that 35% of alleles at a locus are identical by descent, resulting in a sparsely populated S1 genetic map. The degree of inbreeding in S1 is higher than the average of 21% reported for raspberry cultivars (Dale et al 1993), and the 0-25% reported in both blackberry (Rubus subgenus Rubus) (Stafne and Clark 2004) and almond (Prunus dulcis) cultivars (Lansari et al 1994). The parent 96395S1 has a pedigree dominated by black raspberry (R. occidentalis); however it was derived from crosses of black raspberry with red raspberry 'Burnethholm' with the intention to introgress spinelessness from this cultivar.…”
Section: Inter-specific Rubus Genetic Map Constructionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Five parent cultivars dominate the ancestry of red raspberry; 'Lloyd George' and 'Pynes Royal' entirely derived from the European subspecies and 'Preussen', 'Cuthbert' and 'Newburgh' derived from both European and North American subspecies. Domestication has resulted in a reduction of both morphological and genetic diversity in red raspberry (Haskell 1960;Jennings 1988) with modern cultivars being genetically similar (Dale et al 1993;Graham and McNicol 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%