2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2005.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic evaluation of translocation in artificially isolated populations of white-spotted charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dakin et al (2007) showed that the Morgan-Falls dam on Chattahoochee River has reduced the genetic diversity in the population of shoal bass, Micropterus cataractae, especially in the upstream population compared to the downstream population, and the morphological differences between the two populations were highly significant. Yamamoto et al (2006) also noted similar results in white-spotted charr, Salvelinus leucomaenis, populations after 20 years from the construction of the dam.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dakin et al (2007) showed that the Morgan-Falls dam on Chattahoochee River has reduced the genetic diversity in the population of shoal bass, Micropterus cataractae, especially in the upstream population compared to the downstream population, and the morphological differences between the two populations were highly significant. Yamamoto et al (2006) also noted similar results in white-spotted charr, Salvelinus leucomaenis, populations after 20 years from the construction of the dam.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Many freshwater fish species are currently threatened by direct and indirect influences of human activities, such as habitat destruction and fragmentation (Yamamoto et al, 2006). Construction of dams across rivers in particular affects fish movements, which may restrict the gene flow and lead to differentiation of populations (Meldgaard et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a), and N e was estimated to largely exceed 500 (ESM Table S1), suggesting the feasibility of long-term population persistence. Second, as suggested for other fragmented salmonid populations (Yamamoto et al 2006), artificial translocation of individuals from lower subpopulations (e.g., subpopulations 6 and 7) to isolated headwater subpopulations 1 and 2 is an alternative option to installing fish ladder and/or the dam removal. If this measure is carried out, reciprocal genetic exchange is expected to occur among subpopulations, which would have a similar effect with the first option, as well as an effect of delaying the rate of fixation of deleterious alleles (Lande 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Translocating fish into novel habitat spreads the risk of extinction for that species, and may put other species at risk (Ricciardi and Simberloff 2009) and establish a new evolutionary trajectory for the translocated population when compared to the original donor populations (Stockwell and Leberg 2002;Stockwell et al 2003). Differential selection and founder effects are common when establishing new populations from a small number of individuals (Wilcox and Martin 2006;Yamamoto et al 2006). These risks can be minimized if translocations are repeated over time (if not detrimental to the source population) and if fish are moved between similar habitats within their historical range.…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%