“…Given the large differences between Scots pine and maritime pine with respect to their climatic niches, we focused on genes for general responses to different types of abiotic stresses. This is also consistent with previous studies ranking the importance of different fitness-related traits for local adaptation in the species (for Scots pine, see Castro, Zamora, H odar, & G omez, 2002;Galiano, Mart ınez-Vilalta, & Lloret, 2010;Ryypp€ o, Iivonen, Rikala, Sutinen, & Vapaavuori, 1998; and for maritime pine see Corcuera, Gil-Pelegrin, & Notivol, 2011;Gaspar, Velasco, Feito, Al ıa, & Majada, 2013;Lamy et al, 2014;Ram ırez-Valiente & Robledo-Arnuncio, 2014). Then, we used complementary methods to get insights into the action of selective forces, both at specific genes and at genomewide and considered the specific demographic, ecological and historical settings of each species to discuss the possible factors (both methodological and biological) that may explain our results.…”