2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-004-0261-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome diversity and gene haplotypes in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), as revealed by single nucleotide polymorphisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, probabilistically, the expected proportion between transitions and transversions is 1:2, a bias towards transitions is frequently observed, probably as a consequence of greater purifying selection against transversions (Keller et al 2007) that may vary for different organisms (Strandberg and Salter 2004). The transition/transversion ratio observed here (1.77) is similar to that observed in grape (1.56 by Salmaso et al 2004 and1.46 by Lijavetzky et al 2007) and potato (1.5 by Simko et al 2006) and higher than that observed in apple (1.27 by Micheletti et al 2011). The number of polymorphic sites in polymorphic loci (including SNPs and indels) varied from one to six, with an average of 2.3 (Table 4).…”
Section: Sequence Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although, probabilistically, the expected proportion between transitions and transversions is 1:2, a bias towards transitions is frequently observed, probably as a consequence of greater purifying selection against transversions (Keller et al 2007) that may vary for different organisms (Strandberg and Salter 2004). The transition/transversion ratio observed here (1.77) is similar to that observed in grape (1.56 by Salmaso et al 2004 and1.46 by Lijavetzky et al 2007) and potato (1.5 by Simko et al 2006) and higher than that observed in apple (1.27 by Micheletti et al 2011). The number of polymorphic sites in polymorphic loci (including SNPs and indels) varied from one to six, with an average of 2.3 (Table 4).…”
Section: Sequence Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, haplotypes were inferred using PHASE v.2.1.1 [32,33] that included in DnaSP v5. A similar situation was experienced with grapevine [34] and cassava [35]. Haplotype based gene diversity (Hd) was estimated for each polymorphic gene fragment using DnaSP v5.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNPs can be found in large numbers and are more prevalent in the genome, therefore increasing the probability of finding SNP markers near the locus of interest. Currently, there is great interest in genome-wide studies, such as gene mapping (Wang et al, 1998;Yang et al, 2004), evolution (Cargill et al, 1999;Stoneking, 2001;Primmer et al, 2002) and genetic variation assessment (Salmaso et al, 2004;Shamay et al, 2006). SNPs can be the best choice for markers in the studies mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNPs can be the best choice for markers in the studies mentioned. The utilization of SNPs in fruit tree genetic assessment is quite recent (Salmaso et al, 2004). The availability of expressed sequence tag (EST) data has made it feasible to discover putative SNPs in silico prior to experimental verification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%