This
study reports a comparative and mechanistic genotoxicity assessment
of four engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) across three species, including E. coli, yeast, and human cells, with the aim to reveal
the distinct potential genotoxicity mechanisms among the different
nanomaterials and their association with physiochemical features.
Both the conventional phenotypic alkaline comet test and the newly
developed quantitative toxicogenomics assay, that detects and quantifies
molecular level changes in the regulation of six DNA damage repair
pathways, were employed. The proposed molecular endpoints derived
from the toxicogenomics assays, namely TELI (Transcriptional Effect
Level Index) and PELI (Protein Effect Level Index), correlated well
with the phenotypic DNA damage endpoints from comet tests, suggesting
that the molecular genotoxicity assay is suitable for genotoxicity
detection. Temporal altered gene or protein expression profiles revealed
various potential DNA damage types and relevant genotoxic mechanisms
induced by the tested ENMs. nTiO2_a induced a wide spectrum
of DNA damage consistently across three species. Three carbon-based
ENMs, namely carbon black, single wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) and
fullerene, exhibited distinct, species and ENM property-dependent
DNA damage mechanisms. All carbon based ENMs induced relatively weak
DNA damage repair response in E. coli, but more severe
DNA double strand break in eukaryotes. The differences in cellular
structure and defense systems among prokaryotic and eukaryotic species
lead to distinct susceptibility and mechanisms for ENM uptake and,
thus, varying DNA damages and repair responses. The observation suggested
that eukaryotes, especially mammalian cells, are likely more susceptible
to genotoxicity than prokaryotes in the ecosystem when exposed to
these ENMs.