2012
DOI: 10.1038/ng.1033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize

Abstract: Maize is both an exciting model organism in plant genetics and also the most important crop worldwide for food, animal feed and bioenergy production. Recent genome-wide association and metabolic profiling studies aimed to resolve quantitative traits to their causal genetic loci and key metabolic regulators. Here we present a complementary approach that exploits large-scale genomic and metabolic information to predict complex, highly polygenic traits in hybrid testcrosses. We crossed 285 diverse Dent inbred lin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
453
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 543 publications
(479 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
23
453
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we investigate the feasibility of marker-based estimation of heritability with one-and two-stage approaches and look at how heritability estimates affect genomic prediction with the best linear unbiased predictor (G-BLUP) and GWAS. Although our analysis of observed phenotypes focuses on the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, the asymptotic variances of different heritability estimators were also computed for diverse panels of Zea mays (Riedelsheimer et al 2012;Van Heerwaarden et al 2012) and Oryza sativa (Zhao et al 2011).In both published data and new experiments, we found very large standard errors and sometimes unrealistically high estimates of heritability, which could not be explained by varying linkage disequilibrium . Much better heritability estimates were obtained when mixed-model analysis was performed at the individual plant level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Here we investigate the feasibility of marker-based estimation of heritability with one-and two-stage approaches and look at how heritability estimates affect genomic prediction with the best linear unbiased predictor (G-BLUP) and GWAS. Although our analysis of observed phenotypes focuses on the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, the asymptotic variances of different heritability estimators were also computed for diverse panels of Zea mays (Riedelsheimer et al 2012;Van Heerwaarden et al 2012) and Oryza sativa (Zhao et al 2011).In both published data and new experiments, we found very large standard errors and sometimes unrealistically high estimates of heritability, which could not be explained by varying linkage disequilibrium . Much better heritability estimates were obtained when mixed-model analysis was performed at the individual plant level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These differences were hence largest in the structured RegMap and smallest in the HapMap ( Figure S1 and Figure S2). For the asymptotic distributions of heritability estimators given below, we also considered marker-based kinship matrices for three populations of crop plants: the panel described in Van Heerwaarden et al (2012) (Z. mays, 400 accessions), the panel described in Riedelsheimer et al (2012) (Z. mays, 280 accessions), and the panel from Zhao et al (2011) (O. sativa, 413 accessions).…”
Section: Genotypic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the research presented in this article, few studies have evaluated broader relationships between chemical diversity and genetic diversity within species (focusing on the diversity of chemical compound composition among individuals in a population) while examining a select group of metabolites diagnostic of health versus disease (otherwise known as biomarkers) and associated with SNPs under selection. Recent innovations in next‐generation sequencing coupled with untargeted chemical profiling provide unique opportunities to examine these relationships in plant systems (Eckert et al., 2012; Gomez‐Casati, Zanor, & Busi, 2013; Raguso et al., 2015; Riedelsheimer et al., 2012). Integrating next‐generation sequencing technologies with population genomics and community ecology permits identification of chemical compounds and associated SNPs related to disease resistance or other ecologically functional traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%